Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898801›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2018

A serological survey of anthrax in domestic dogs in Zimbabwe: a potential tool for anthrax surveillance.

N L Mukarati, O Ndumnego, H van Heerden, D N Ndhlovu, G Matope, A Caron, M de Garine-Wichatitsky, D M Pfukenyi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Seasonality and Ecological Suitability Modelling for Anthrax (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

N L MukaratiDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Studies,Faculty of Veterinary Science,University of Zimbabwe,PO Box MP 167,Mt. Pleasant, Harare,Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0002-0150-9170
O NdumnegoDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases,Faculty of Veterinary Science,University of Pretoria,Private Bag X 04,Onderstepoort 0110,Pretoria,South Africa.
H van HeerdenDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases,Faculty of Veterinary Science,University of Pretoria,Private Bag X 04,Onderstepoort 0110,Pretoria,South Africa.
D N NdhlovuDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Studies,Faculty of Veterinary Science,University of Zimbabwe,PO Box MP 167,Mt. Pleasant, Harare,Zimbabwe.
G MatopeDepartment of Paraclinical Veterinary Studies,Faculty of Veterinary Science,University of Zimbabwe,PO Box MP 167,Mt. Pleasant, Harare,Zimbabwe.
A CaronASTRE, CIRAD, INRA,Univ. de Montpellier,Montpellier,France.
M de Garine-WichatitskyASTRE, CIRAD, INRA,Univ. de Montpellier,Montpellier,France.
D M PfukenyiDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Studies,Faculty of Veterinary Science,University of Zimbabwe,PO Box MP 167,Mt. Pleasant, Harare,Zimbabwe.
University of Zimbabwe · ZWCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FROnderstepoort Veterinary Academic Hospital · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthrax is an important disease caused by the bacterium Bacillus anthracis affecting both domestic and wild animals at the wildlife/livestock interface, defined here as a physical space in which wild and domestic species overlap in range and potentially interact. In endemic regions, sporadic anthrax outbreaks occur, causing significant deaths of both wildlife and livestock and sporadically, humans. However, it may also occur as isolated outbreaks with a few animals affected. Such isolated anthrax outbreaks maybe missed. High seroprevalence among carnivores suggests either regular non-fatal exposure to the pathogen circulating in a given environment, or contact with missed cases through consumption of anthrax carcases. To investigate the relevance of this potential indicator, a cross-sectional study was conducted to determine anthrax seroprevalence in domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) from selected interface and non-interface areas of Zimbabwe with known history of anthrax outbreaks. Based on past anthrax outbreaks in the respective areas, the sites were further classified as high or low risk areas for anthrax outbreaks. Sera were collected from domestic dogs (n = 186) and tested for antibodies against B. anthracis protective antigens (PA) using an ELISA test. The overall seroprevalence was 51.6% (96/186; 95% CI 44.2-59.0). Sites from the non-interface areas recorded a significantly (P < 0.001) higher (72.1%) anthrax seroprevalence compared with those from the wildlife -livestock interface (41.5%). The results demonstrated a strong association (χ2 = 14.3; OR = 3.2, 1.6 < OR < 6.2, P < 0.001) between anthrax seropositivity and interface type. Low-risk sites (42.5%) had a significantly (P = 0.044) lower seroprevalence compared with high-risk sites (58.5%) but still demonstrated high seroprevalence for areas where anthrax was last reported more than 20 years back. Dogs from Tsholotsho South were more than 90-times (OR = 96.5, 13.5 < OR < 690.8) more likely to be seropositive compared with those from Hwange. The study demonstrated the potential to use domestic dogs as indicators of anthrax in the study areas to survey anthrax circulation in supposed low-risk areas and calls for a redefinition of both low and high risk areas for anthrax in Zimbabwe based on an improved surveillance.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthraxDisease OutbreaksDog DiseasesDogsPopulation SurveillanceSeroepidemiologic StudiesZimbabweAnthraxdomestic dogsseroprevalencewildlife/livestock interfaceZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID29898801
PMCPMC9507935
OpenAlexW2808196602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.