Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898799›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2018

Occurrence, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and genotypic relatedness of Salmonella spp. isolates from captive wildlife, their caretakers, feed and water in India.

Arockiasamy Arun Prince Milton, Rajesh Kumar Agarwal, Govindarajan Bhuvana Priya, Cheruplackal Karunakaran Athira, Mani Saminathan, Avinash Reddy, Manivasagam Aravind, Ashok Kumar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. First Case Report ofInfectious disease reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Revisiting the Biological Behavior ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arockiasamy Arun Prince MiltonDivision of Veterinary Public Health,ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Izatnagar,Bareilly-243122,Uttar Pradesh,India.
Rajesh Kumar AgarwalDivision of Bacteriology and Mycology,ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Izatnagar,Bareilly-243122,Uttar Pradesh,India.ORCID 0000-0001-5150-5752
Govindarajan Bhuvana PriyaDivision of Bacteriology and Mycology,ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Izatnagar,Bareilly-243122,Uttar Pradesh,India.
Cheruplackal Karunakaran AthiraDivision of Veterinary Public Health,ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Izatnagar,Bareilly-243122,Uttar Pradesh,India.ORCID 0000-0003-1053-5538
Mani SaminathanDivision of Pathology,ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Izatnagar,Bareilly-243122,Uttar Pradesh,India.
Avinash ReddyDivision of Veterinary Public Health,ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Izatnagar,Bareilly-243122,Uttar Pradesh,India.
Manivasagam AravindDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology,Madras Veterinary College,Chennai-600007,Tamilnadu,India.
Ashok KumarDivision of Animal Science,Krishi Bhavan,New Delhi,India.
Indian Veterinary Research Institute · INTamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occurrence of Salmonella spp. in captive wild animal species in India is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence of different Salmonella serotypes, antimicrobial resistance patterns and genotypic relatedness of recovered isolates. A total of 370 samples including faecal (n = 314), feed and water (n = 26) and caretakers stool swabs (n = 30) were collected from 40 different wild animal species in captivity, their caretakers, feed and water in four zoological gardens and wildlife enclosures in India. Salmonellae were isolated using conventional culture methods and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility with the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Salmonella isolates were serotyped and genotyping was performed using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) PCR and 16S rRNA sequencing. Animal faecal samples were also subjected to direct PCR assay. Salmonella was detected in 10 of 314 (3.1%) faecal samples by isolation and 18 of 314 (5.7%) samples by direct PCR assay; one of 26 (3.8%) feed and water samples and five of 30 (16.7%) caretakers stool swabs by isolation. Salmonella was more commonly isolated in faecal samples from golden pheasants (25%; 2/8) and leopard (10%; 2/20). Salmonella enterica serotypes of known public health significance including S. Typhimurium (37.5%; 6/14), S. Kentucky (28.5%; 4/14) and S. Enteritidis (14.3%; 2/14) were identified. While the majority of the Salmonella isolates were pan-susceptible to the commonly used antibiotics. Seven (43.7%; 7/16) of the isolates were resistant to at least one antibiotic and one isolate each among them exhibited penta and tetra multidrug-resistant types. Three S. Kentucky serotype were identified in a same golden pheasants cage, two from the birds and one from the feed. This serotype was also isolated from its caretaker. Similarly, one isolate each of S. Typhimurium were recovered from ostrich and its caretaker. These isolates were found to be clonally related suggesting that wildlife may serve as reservoir for infections to humans and vice versa. These results emphasise the transmission of Salmonella among hosts via environmental contamination of feces to workers, visitors and other wildlife.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsAnimals, WildAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialFecesGenotypeHumansIndiaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolymerase Chain ReactionSalmonellaSalmonella InfectionsSalmonella Infections, AnimalSerotypingWater MicrobiologyAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial resistanceERIC-PCRIndiaSalmonella entericawild animals

Identifiers

PMID29898799
PMCPMC9507934
OpenAlexW2807853843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.