Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898763›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial.

Xing-Wang Zhu, Yuan Shi, Li-Ping Shi, Ling Liu, Jiang Xue, Rangasamy Ramanathan, NHFOV Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03099694 (Noninvasive Ventilation for Preterm Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03099694 nacompletednot on this map

Noninvasive Ventilation for Preterm Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorXingwang ZhuRan2017 to 2018Enrolled340ConditionsPreterm InfantsArmsnoninvasive high-frequency ventilation (nHFOV), nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Xing-Wang ZhuDaping Hospital, Research Institute of Surgery, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Yuan ShiDaping Hospital, Research Institute of Surgery, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Li-Ping ShiThe Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310000, China.
Ling LiuGuiyang Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Guiyang, 550000, China.
Jiang XueThe Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250000, China.
Rangasamy RamanathanLAC+USC Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. ramanath@usc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7358-601X
NHFOV Study Group
Army Medical University · CNChildren's Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNLAC+USC Medical Center · USSecond Hospital of Shandong University · CNUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Scientific research Projects unit of Chongqing cstc2016shms-ztzx
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is associated with the development of adverse pulmonary and non-pulmonary outcomes in very premature infants. Various modes of non-invasive respiratory support are increasingly being used to decrease the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The aim of this trial is to compare the effect of non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) as a primary non-invasive ventilation support mode. METHODS/

designIn this multi-center randomized controlled trial, 300 preterm infants born at a gestational age of 26 DISCUSSION: In recent decades, several observational studies have compared the effects of NHFOV and NCPAP in neonates as a rescue mode or during weaning from IMV. To our knowledge, this will be the first multi-center prospective, randomized controlled trial to evaluate NHFOV as a primary mode in preterm infants with RDS in China or any other part of the world. Our trial may help to establish guidelines for NHFOV in preterm infants with RDS to minimize the need for IMV, and to decrease the significant pulmonary and non-pulmonary morbidities associated with IMV.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03099694 . Registered on 4 April 2017.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureInfant, PrematurePremature BirthAge FactorsChild DevelopmentChinaFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicNoninvasive VentilationProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicInvasive mechanical ventilationNasal continuous positive airway pressureNon-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilationPreterm infantsRespiratory distress syndromeSurfactant

Identifiers

PMID29898763
PMCPMC6001134
OpenAlexW2808649031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.