Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898762›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2018

Identifying an early treatment window for predicting breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using immunohistopathology and hemoglobin parameters.

Quing Zhu, Susan Tannenbaum, Scott H Kurtzman, Patricia DeFusco, Andrew Ricci, Hamed Vavadi, Feifei Zhou, Chen Xu, Alex Merkulov, Poornima Hegde and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02092636 (Ultrasound and Near Infrared Imaging for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Monitoring), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02092636 nacompletednot on this map

Ultrasound and Near Infrared Imaging for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Monitoring

TypeinterventionalSponsorUConn HealthRan2014 to 2017Enrolled10ConditionsBreast CancerArmsNIR/US Diagnostic Group, NIR/US Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Group, NIR/US Process Validation Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biomedical optics express · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics analysis for prediction of breast cancers insensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Quing ZhuBiomedical Engineering and Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, One Brookings Drive, Mail Box 1097, Whitaker Hall 300D, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA. zhu.q@wustl.edu.
Susan TannenbaumUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Scott H KurtzmanWaterbury Hospital, Waterbury, CT, 6708, USA.
Patricia DeFuscoHartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA.
Andrew RicciHartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA.
Hamed VavadiUniversity of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
Feifei ZhouUniversity of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
Chen XuNew York City College of Technology, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, USA.
Alex MerkulovUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Poornima HegdeUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Mark KaneUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Liqun WangDepartment of Statistics, University of Manitoba, 186 Dysart Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada.
Kert SabbathWaterbury Hospital, Waterbury, CT, 6708, USA.
UConn Health · USHartford Hospital · USUniversity of Connecticut · USWaterbury Hospital · USCity University of New York · USUniversity of Manitoba · CAWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Near Infrared Diffused Light Imaging with Ultrasound Guidance: Predicting Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ResponseR01EB002136 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZHU, QUING · 2003 to 2016
$3.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) varies with tumor subtype. The purpose of this study was to identify an early treatment window for predicting pCR based on tumor subtype, pretreatment total hemoglobin (tHb) level, and early changes in tHb following NAC.

methodsTwenty-two patients (mean age 56 years, range 34-74 years) were assessed using a near-infrared imager coupled with an Ultrasound system prior to treatment, 7 days after the first treatment, at the end of each of the first three cycles, and before their definitive surgery. Pathologic responses were dichotomized by the Miller-Payne system. Tumor vascularity was assessed from tHb; vascularity changes during NAC were assessed from a percentage tHb normalized to the pretreatment level (%tHb). After training the logistic prediction models using the previous study data, we assessed the early treatment window for predicting pathological response according to their tumor subtype (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), estrogen receptor (ER), triple-negative (TN)) based on tHb, and %tHb measured at different cycles and evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).

resultsIn the new study cohort, maximum pretreatment tHb and %tHb changes after cycles 1, 2, and 3 were significantly higher in responder Miller-Payne 4-5 tumors (n = 13) than non-or partial responder Miller-Payne 1-3 tumors (n = 9). However, no significance was found at day 7. The AUC of the predictive power of pretreatment tHb in the cohort was 0.75, which was similar to the performance of the HER2 subtype as a single predictor (AUC of 0.78). A greater predictive power of pretreatment tHb was found within each subtype, with AUCs of 0.88, 0.69, and 0.72, in the HER2, ER, and TN subtypes, respectively. Using pretreatment tHb and cycle 1 %tHb, AUC reached 0.96, 0.91, and 0.90 in HER2, ER, and TN subtypes, respectively, and 0.95 regardless of subtype. Additional cycle 2 %tHb measurements moderately improved prediction for the HER2 subtype but did not improve prediction for the ER and TN subtypes.

conclusionsBy combining tumor subtypes with tHb, we predicted the pCR of breast cancer to NAC before treatment. Prediction accuracy can be significantly improved by incorporating cycle 1 and 2 %tHb for the HER2 subtype and cycle 1 %tHb for the ER and TN subtypes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02092636 . Registered in March 2014.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreastBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHemoglobinsHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedReceptors, EstrogenTreatment OutcomeERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesHemoglobinsReceptors, EstrogenNear infrared imagingPersonalized medicinePredicting neoadjuvant chemotherapyUltrasound-guided optical imaging

Identifiers

PMID29898762
PMCPMC6001175
OpenAlexW2808117081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.