Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898745›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2018

Amide chemical exchange saturation transfer at 7 T: a possible biomarker for detecting early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Erwin Krikken, Vitaliy Khlebnikov, Moritz Zaiss, Rajni A Jibodh, Paul J van Diest, Peter R Luijten, Dennis W J Klomp, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Jannie P Wijnen

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Erwin KrikkenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. e.krikken@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9629-604X
Vitaliy KhlebnikovDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Moritz ZaissMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Rajni A JibodhDepartment of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter R LuijtenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dennis W J KlompDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hanneke W M van LaarhovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jannie P WijnenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this work was to investigate noninvasive early detection of treatment response of breast cancer patients to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) using chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) measurements sensitive to amide proton transfer (APT) at 7 T.

methodsCEST images were acquired in 10 tumors of nine breast cancer patients treated with NAC. APT signals in the tumor, before and after the first cycle of NAC, were quantified using a three-pool Lorentzian fit of the z-spectra in the region of interest. The changes in APT were subsequently related to pathological response after surgery defined by the Miller-Payne system.

resultsSignificant differences (P <  0.05, unpaired Mann-Whitney test) were found in the APT signal before and after the first cycle of NAC in six out of 10 lesions, of which two showed a pathological complete response. Of the remaining four lesions, one showed a pathological complete response. No significant difference in changes of APT signal were found between the different pathological responses to NAC treatment (P > 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test).

conclusionsThis preliminary study shows the feasibility of using APT CEST magnetic resonance imaging as a noninvasive biomarker to assess the effect of NAC in an early stage of NAC treatment of breast cancer patients.

trial registrationRegistration number, NL49333.041.14/ NTR4980 . Registered on 16 October 2014.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyAdultAmidesBiomarkers, PharmacologicalBiomarkers, TumorBreastBreast NeoplasmsContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProtonsStatistics, NonparametricAmidesBiomarkers, PharmacologicalBiomarkers, TumorContrast MediaProtons7 T MRIAPT CESTBreast cancerNAC treatmentResponse prediction

Identifiers

PMID29898745
PMCPMC6001024
OpenAlexW2808088866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.