Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898742›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2018

Abortion-related emergency department visits in the United States: An analysis of a national emergency department sample.

Ushma D Upadhyay, Nicole E Johns, Rebecca Barron, Alice F Cartwright, Chantal Tapé, Alyssa Mierjeski, Alyson J McGregor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Post-abortion Complications: A Narrative Review for Emergency Clinicians.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ushma D UpadhyayDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, California, 94612, USA. ushma.upadhyay@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2731-2157
Nicole E JohnsDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, California, 94612, USA.
Rebecca BarronDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Alice F CartwrightDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, California, 94612, USA.
Chantal TapéDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Alyssa MierjeskiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Alyson J McGregorDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Brown University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Society of Family Planning SFPRF10-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedia depictions and laws passed in state legislatures regulating abortion suggest abortion-related medical emergencies are common. An accurate understanding of abortion-related emergencies is important for informing policy and practice. We assessed the incidence of abortion-related emergency department (ED) visits in the United States (U.S.).

methodsWe used a retrospective observational study design using 2009-2013 data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, a nationally representative sample of U.S. ED visits from 947 to 964 hospitals across the U.S. per year. All ED visits among women of reproductive age (15-49) were included. We categorized ED visits by abortion relatedness and treatments received, and assessed whether the visit was for a major incident (defined as requiring blood transfusion, surgery, or overnight inpatient stay). We estimated the proportion of visits that were abortion-related and described the characteristics of patients making these visits, the diagnoses and subsequent treatments received by these patients, the sociodemographic and hospital characteristics associated with the incidents and observation care only (defined as receiving no treatments), and the rate of major incidents for all abortion patients in the U.S.

resultsAmong all ED visits by women aged 15-49 (189,480,685), 0.01% (n = 27,941) were abortion-related. Of these visits, 51% (95% confidence interval, 95% CI 49.3-51.9%) of the women received observation care only. A total of 20% (95% CI 19.3-21.3%) of abortion-related ED visits were for major incidents. One-fifth (22%, 95% CI 20.9-23.0%) of abortion-related visits resulted in admission to the same hospital for abortion-related reasons. Of the visits, 1.4% (n = 390, 95% CI 1.1-1.7%) were potentially due to attempts at self-induced abortion. In multivariable models, women using Medicaid (adjusted odds ratio, AOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.52) and women with a comorbid condition (AORs 2.47-4.63) had higher odds of having a major incident than women using private insurance and those without comorbid conditions. During the study period, 0.11% of all abortions in the U.S. resulted in major incidents as seen in EDs.

conclusionsAbortion-related ED visits comprise a small proportion of women's ED visits. Many abortion-related ED visits may not be indicated or could have been managed at a less costly level of care. Given the low rate of major incidents, perceptions that abortion is unsafe are not based on evidence.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAdolescentAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung AdultAbortionComplicationsEmergenciesEmergency departmentHealth policiesHospital admission

Identifiers

PMID29898742
PMCPMC6000974
OpenAlexW2805375390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.