ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2018
Dutch norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - parent form for children aged 2-18 years.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recess as a Setting for Child Development: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Physical Activity, Motor Skills and Social-Emotional Functioning.The Journal of school health · 2026Trial
- The efficacy of a self-help parenting program for parents of children with externalizing behavior: a randomized controlled trial.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2023Trial
- Effectiveness of Specific Techniques in Behavioral Teacher Training for Childhood ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Microtrial.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53Trial
- Co-developmental trajectories of emotional symptoms and peer problems from childhood to adolescence: associations with positive and negative mental health outcomes.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Boys Score Higher Everywhere? Gender Differences in Parent-Reported ADHD Symptoms Across Age Groups and Four Countries.Child psychiatry and human development · 2026Article
- Normative Data of Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Parent Form in Indian Children Between the Ages of 6 and 11 Years.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2026Article
- Longitudinal functional and neuropsychological 2-year follow-up after intensive care admission for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- The Relationship Between Parental Phubbing and Preschoolers' Behavioral Problems: The Mediation Role of Mindful Attention Awareness.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Age- and sex-related differences in social competence and emotion labeling in pre-adolescence.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025Article
- Psychosocial functioning in children with a congenital heart disease: attachment and emotion regulation strategies of children and parents as explanatory factors.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- How to Link Assessment and Suitable Interventions for Adolescents: Relationships among Mental Health, Friendships, Demographic Indicators and Well-Being at School.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Household energy poverty and trajectories of emotional and behavioural difficulties in children and adolescents: findings from two prospective cohort studies.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Lifestyle Habits Related to Internet Use in Adolescents: Relationships between Wellness, Happiness, and Mental Health.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Factors influencing children's emotional and behavioral problems perceived by North Korean refugee mothers: a descriptive study.Child health nursing research · 2024Article
- Development of the gut microbiota in the first 14 years of life and its relations to internalizing and externalizing difficulties and social anxiety during puberty.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2024Article
- Parent-perceived recurrent pain in children: associations with maternal pain, depressiveness, socioeconomic status, and children's behavioural difficulties.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Greenlandic norms for the parent-report and self-report versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).International journal of circumpolar health · 2023Article
- Maternal Mental Health and Children's Problem Behaviours: A Bi-directional Relationship?Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2023Article
- Association between Electronic Media Use and Internalizing Problems: The Mediating Effect of Parent-Child Conflict and Moderating Effect of Children's Age.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentification of children at risk for psychosocial problems is important to be able to provide supportive and tailored care at an early stage. Due to its brevity and wide age range, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Parent Form is an appropriate instrument for use in paediatric clinical practice as it facilitates assessment of psychosocial functioning from young childhood into adulthood. The aim of the present study was to provide Dutch normative data for the SDQ Parent Form.
methodsA sample of 1947 parents with children aged 2-18 years was drawn from a large panel of a Dutch research agency, stratified on Dutch key demographics of the parents. The SDQ Parent Form assesses the child's Emotional symptoms, Conduct problems, Hyperactivity-Inattention, Peer problems and Prosocial behaviour. Summary scores can be calculated: Internalising, Externalising and Total difficulties. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) and normative scores (mean, median, clinical cut-off scores) of the SDQ- Parent Form were calculated in four age-groups 2-3, 4-5, 6-11 and 12-18 years. Gender differences were tested with independent t-tests.
resultsA total of 1174 parents (60.3%) completed the SDQ. In the age-groups 2-3 and 4-5, norm scores are not available for Conduct problems and Peer problems due to insufficient internal consistency. In addition, in age-group 2-3, norm scores for Emotional symptoms and Internalising are not available because of insufficient internal consistency. In the age-groups 6-11 and 12-18, norm scores are available for all scales, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients 0.53-0.86. The comparison by gender revealed that boys had more behavioural problems than girls (0.000 < p < 0.048), most prevalent for Hyperactivity-Inattention, Peer Problems, Prosocial behaviour, Externalising and Total Difficulties.
conclusionsDutch normative data by age-group and gender are now available for parent-reported SDQ scores in children aged 2-18 years. Due to insufficient internal consistency, normative scores for 2-5 year-old children could not be presented for several SDQ scales. Yet, the SDQ Total score provides a reliable indication of the psychosocial functioning of younger children. In case of high Total scores in children younger than 6 years, alternatively to scale scores, the answers on the individual items could yield useful clinical information about the child's problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.