Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898715›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2018

Blind blur assessment of MRI images using parallel multiscale difference of Gaussian filters.

Michael E Osadebey, Marius Pedersen, Douglas L Arnold, Katrina E Wendel-Mitoraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael E OsadebeyNeuroRx Research Inc, Montreal, 3575 Parc Avenue, Suite # 5322, Montreal, QC, H2X 3P9, Canada.
Marius PedersenDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Teknologivegen 22, 2815, Gjovik, Norway. marius.pedersen@ntnu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9797-5821
Douglas L ArnoldMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, 3801 University St, Montreal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada.
Katrina E Wendel-MitorajBrainCare Oy, Finn-Medi 1 PL 2000, 33521, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904Norges Forskningsråd 247689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRician noise, bias fields and blur are the common distortions that degrade MRI images during acquisition. Blur is unique in comparison to Rician noise and bias fields because it can be introduced into an image beyond the acquisition stage such as postacquisition processing and the manifestation of pathological conditions. Most current blur assessment algorithms are designed and validated on consumer electronics such as television, video and mobile appliances. The few algorithms dedicated to medical images either requires a reference image or incorporate manual approach. For these reasons it is difficult to compare quality measures from different images and images with different contents. Furthermore, they will not be suitable in environments where large volumes of images are processed. In this report we propose a new blind blur assessment method for different types of MRI images and for different applications including automated environments.

methodsTwo copies of the test image are generated. Edge map is extracted by separately convolving each copy of the test image with two parallel difference of Gaussian filters. At the start of the multiscale representation, the initial output of the filters are equal. In subsequent scales of the multiscale representation, each filter is tuned to different operating parameters over the same fixed range of Gaussian scales. The filters are termed low and high energy filters based on their characteristics to successively attenuate and highlight edges over the range of multiscale representation. Quality score is predicted from the distance between the normalized mean of the edge maps at the final output of the filters.

resultsThe proposed method was evaluated on cardiac and brain MRI images. Performance evaluation shows that the quality index has very good correlation with human perception and will be suitable for application in routine clinical practice and clinical research.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSignal-To-Noise RatioAlgorithmsArtifactsBrainHeartHumansImage EnhancementMovementNormal DistributionBlurContrastDifference of GaussianEdgesLocal contrast feature imageMulti-scale representationSharpness

Identifiers

PMID29898715
PMCPMC6001176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.