ArticleBiomedical engineering online2018
Blind blur assessment of MRI images using parallel multiscale difference of Gaussian filters.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of (semi-)automatic quality control of T1-weighted MRI scans.Neuroradiology · 2024Pooled it
- Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction for brain fluid-attenuated inversion recovery: image quality and white matter hyperintensity volume analysis.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Automated quality control of T1-weighted brain MRI scans for clinical research datasets: methods comparison and design of a quality prediction classifier.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Comparison of MRI radiomics-based machine learning survival models in predicting prognosis of glioblastoma multiforme.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Automated Optical Inspection for Defect Identification and Classification in Actual Woven Fabric Production Lines.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Brief Survey on No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Methods for Magnetic Resonance Images.Journal of imaging · 2022Article
- Implementation and prospective clinical validation of AI-based planning and shimming techniques in cardiac MRI.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Three-dimensional inhomogeneous magnetization transfer with rapid gradient-echo (3D ihMTRAGE) imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Decoding and Systematization of Medical Imaging Features of Multiple Human Malignancies.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRician noise, bias fields and blur are the common distortions that degrade MRI images during acquisition. Blur is unique in comparison to Rician noise and bias fields because it can be introduced into an image beyond the acquisition stage such as postacquisition processing and the manifestation of pathological conditions. Most current blur assessment algorithms are designed and validated on consumer electronics such as television, video and mobile appliances. The few algorithms dedicated to medical images either requires a reference image or incorporate manual approach. For these reasons it is difficult to compare quality measures from different images and images with different contents. Furthermore, they will not be suitable in environments where large volumes of images are processed. In this report we propose a new blind blur assessment method for different types of MRI images and for different applications including automated environments.
methodsTwo copies of the test image are generated. Edge map is extracted by separately convolving each copy of the test image with two parallel difference of Gaussian filters. At the start of the multiscale representation, the initial output of the filters are equal. In subsequent scales of the multiscale representation, each filter is tuned to different operating parameters over the same fixed range of Gaussian scales. The filters are termed low and high energy filters based on their characteristics to successively attenuate and highlight edges over the range of multiscale representation. Quality score is predicted from the distance between the normalized mean of the edge maps at the final output of the filters.
resultsThe proposed method was evaluated on cardiac and brain MRI images. Performance evaluation shows that the quality index has very good correlation with human perception and will be suitable for application in routine clinical practice and clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.