Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898702›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2018

Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial.

Pablo Altman, Luis Wehbe, Juergen Dederichs, Tadhg Guerin, Brian Ament, Miguel Cardenas Moronta, Andrea Valeria Pino, Pankaj Goyal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02596009 (Multicenter Open-label Cross-over Study to Compare Inspiratory Flow Rates Achieved by the COPD Patients Through Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and Handihaler® Dry Powder Inhaler Devices), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02596009 phase4completednot on this map

Multicenter Open-label Cross-over Study to Compare Inspiratory Flow Rates Achieved by the COPD Patients Through Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and Handihaler® Dry Powder Inhaler Devices

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2015 to 2016Enrolled97ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive (COPD)ArmsBreezhaler®, Ellipta®, Handihaler®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Randomized dose-finding study of batefenterol via dry powder inhaler in patients with COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Exploration of quality criteria for the detection of peak inspiratory flow under different resistance conditions.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Performance Characteristics of BreezhalerClinical drug investigation · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pablo AltmanNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA. pablo.altman@novartis.com.
Luis WehbeInstituto Ave Pulmo, Fundación Enfisema, Mar del Plata, Argentina.
Juergen DederichsNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Tadhg GuerinNovartis Ireland Limited, Dublin, Ireland.
Brian AmentNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, San Carlos, California, USA.
Miguel Cardenas MorontaNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Andrea Valeria PinoNovartis Argentina S.A, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pankaj GoyalNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (United States) · USNovartis (Ireland) · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe chronic and progressive nature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires self-administration of inhaled medication. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are increasingly being used for inhalation therapy in COPD. Important considerations when selecting DPIs include inhalation effort required and flow rates achieved by patients. Here, we present the comparison of the peak inspiratory flow rate (PIF) values achieved by COPD patients, with moderate to very severe airflow limitation, through the Breezhaler®, the Ellipta® and the HandiHaler® inhalers. The effects of disease severity, age and gender on PIF rate were also evaluated.

methodsThis randomized, open-label, multicenter, cross-over, Phase IV study recruited patients with moderate to very severe airflow limitation (Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease 2014 strategy), aged ≥40 years and having a smoking history of ≥10 pack years. No active drug or placebo was administered during the study. The inhalation profiles were recorded using inhalers fitted with a pressure tap and transducer at the wall of the mouthpiece. For each patient, the inhalation with the highest PIF value, out of three replicate inhalations per device, was selected for analysis. A paired t-test was performed to compare mean PIFs between each combination of devices.

resultsIn total, 97 COPD patients were enrolled and completed the study. The highest mean PIF value (L/min ± SE) was observed with the Breezhaler® (108 ± 23), followed by the Ellipta® (78 ± 15) and the HandiHaler® (49 ± 9) inhalers and the lowest mean pressure drop values were recorded with the Breezhaler® inhaler, followed by the Ellipta® inhaler and the HandiHaler® inhaler, in the overall patient population. A similar trend was consistently observed in patients across all subgroups of COPD severity, within all age groups and for both genders.

conclusionsPatients with COPD were able to inhale with the least inspiratory effort and generate the highest mean PIF value through the Breezhaler® inhaler when compared with the Ellipta® and the HandiHaler® inhalers. These results were similar irrespective of patients' COPD severity, age or gender.

trial registrationThe trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02596009 on 4 November 2015.

Indexed as

Airway ResistanceDry Powder InhalersInspiratory CapacityPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveWork of BreathingAgedAge FactorsCross-Over StudiesEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRespiratory TherapySelf AdministrationBreezhaler®Dry powder inhalersInspiratory effortPeak inspiratory flowPressure drop

Identifiers

PMID29898702
PMCPMC6001060
OpenAlexW2808716097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.