Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898673›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2018

What do we know about frailty in the acute care setting? A scoping review.

Olga Theou, Emma Squires, Kayla Mallery, Jacques S Lee, Sherri Fay, Judah Goldstein, Joshua J Armstrong, Kenneth Rockwood

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olga TheouDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Camp Hill Veterans' Memorial Building, 5955 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS, B3H 2E1, Canada. Olga.Theou@dal.ca.
Emma SquiresGeriatric Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Camp Hill Veterans' Memorial Building, 5955 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS, B3H 2E1, Canada.
Kayla MalleryGeriatric Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Camp Hill Veterans' Memorial Building, 5955 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS, B3H 2E1, Canada.
Jacques S LeeSunnybrook Health Service, 2075 Bayview Avenue, BG-04, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Sherri FayGeriatric Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Camp Hill Veterans' Memorial Building, 5955 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS, B3H 2E1, Canada.
Judah GoldsteinEmergency Health Services, 239 Brownlow Avenue, Suite 300, Dartmouth, NS, B3B 2B2, Canada.
Joshua J ArmstrongDepartment of Health Sciences, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 5E1, Canada.
Kenneth RockwoodGeriatric Medicine, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Camp Hill Veterans' Memorial Building, 5955 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS, B3H 2E1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability of acute care providers to cope with the influx of frail older patients is increasingly stressed, and changes need to be made to improve care provided to older adults. Our purpose was to conduct a scoping review to map and synthesize the literature addressing frailty in the acute care setting in order to understand how to tackle this challenge. We also aimed to highlight the current gaps in frailty research.

methodsThis scoping review included original research articles with acutely-ill Emergency Medical Services (EMS) or hospitalized older patients who were identified as frail by the authors. We searched Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Eric, and Cochrane from January 2000 to September 2015.

resultsOur database search initially resulted in 8658 articles and 617 were eligible. In 67% of the articles the authors identified their participants as frail but did not report on how they measured frailty. Among the 204 articles that did measure frailty, the most common disciplines were geriatrics (14%), emergency department (14%), and general medicine (11%). In total, 89 measures were used. This included 13 established tools, used in 51% of the articles, and 35 non-frailty tools, used in 24% of the articles. The most commonly used tools were the Clinical Frailty Scale, the Frailty Index, and the Frailty Phenotype (12% each). Most often (44%) researchers used frailty tools to predict adverse health outcomes. In 74% of the cases frailty predicted the outcome examined, typically mortality and length of stay.

conclusionsMost studies (83%) were conducted in non-geriatric disciplines and two thirds of the articles identified participants as frail without measuring frailty. There was great variability in tools used and more recently published studies were more likely to use established frailty tools. Overall, frailty appears to be a good predictor of adverse health outcomes. For frailty to be implemented in clinical practice frailty tools should help formulate the care plan and improve shared decision making. How this will happen has yet to be determined.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyGeneral PracticeGeriatric AssessmentGeriatricsHumansMaleAcute careAgingFrail elderlyFrailtyOlder adultsScoping review

Identifiers

PMID29898673
PMCPMC6000922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.