SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2018
Meta-analysis and systematic review of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug eluting stent implantation in left main coronary disease in 4592 patients.
Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06272643 (Comparison Between Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound for Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison Between Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound for Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of intravascular imaging-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Pooled it
- The long-term clinical outcomes of intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided coronary drug eluting stent implantation in longFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Short- and Long-Term Prognosis of Intravascular Ultrasound-Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis Involving 24,783 Patients.Journal of interventional cardiology · 2021Pooled it
- Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Pooled it
- Left main coronary artery stenosis assessment on coronary CT angiography.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Intracoronary imaging in percutaneous coronary intervention: why, when, how and which from large, randomized trials.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of novel ultrathin, biodegradable polymer tetriflex (sirolimus-eluting stent) optimization using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in short coronary lesion (≤ 20mm) vs. long coronary lesion (≥ 20mm): Tetriflex IVUS study.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of IVUS-guided and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for left main coronary artery disease: a retrospective consort study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Role of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in intracoronary imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2024Article
- Impacts of the SYNTAX score I, II and SYNTAX score II 2020 on left main revascularization.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Intracoronary Imaging: Current Practice and Future Perspectives.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Imaging of Left Main Coronary Artery; Untangling the Gordian Knot.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Advantages and prospects of optical coherence tomography in interventional therapy of coronary heart disease (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Review
- Fundamentals of percutaneous coronary bifurcation interventions.World journal of cardiology · 2022Review
- Role of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Optimizing Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- The assessment of intermediate coronary lesions using intracoronary imaging.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Review
- When to use intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography during percutaneous coronary intervention?Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Review
- Thin and crush: The new mantra in left main stenting?World journal of cardiology · 2018Article
- What Is the Clinical Utility of Intravascular Ultrasound?Current cardiology reports · 2018Review
- PCI in Patients With Heart Failure: Current Evidence, Impact of Complete Revascularization, and Contemporary Techniques to Improve Outcomes.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough several meta-analyses have demonstrated the utility of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in guiding drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation compared to angiography-guidance, there has been a dearth of evidence in the left main coronary artery (LMCA) lesion subset.
methodsWe performed a meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes of IVUS versus conventional angiography guidance during implantation of DES for patients with LMCA disease. Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase were searched.
resultsA total of 1002 publications were reviewed; and finally, seven clinical studies - one prospective randomized controlled trial and six observational studies with 4592 patients (1907 IVUS-guided and 2685 angiography-guided) - were included in the meta-analysis. IVUS guidance was associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiac events (relative ratio [RR] 95% CI 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 0.70; P < 0.001), all-cause death (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.71; P < 0.001), cardiac death (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.62; P < 0.001), myocardial infarction (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.55 to 0.80; P < 0.001), and stent thrombosis (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.84; P = 0.01) compared with angiographic guidance. However, there was no significant difference regarding target lesion revascularization (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.31 to 1.18; P = 0.099) and target vessel revascularization (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.56; P = 0. 322).
conclusionsCompared to angiographic guidance, IVUS-guided DES implantation was associated with better clinical outcomes for patients with LMCA lesions, especially hard endpoints of death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.