Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898668›Full record

SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2018

Meta-analysis and systematic review of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug eluting stent implantation in left main coronary disease in 4592 patients.

Yue Wang, Gary S Mintz, Zhichun Gu, Yue Qi, Yue Wang, Mengru Liu, Xiaofan Wu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06272643 (Comparison Between Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound for Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06272643 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Between Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound for Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions

TypeobservationalSponsorFundación EPICRan2024 to 2026Enrolled153ConditionsCoronary DiseaseArmsIVUS (Intravascular Ultrasound) and OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yue WangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Gary S MintzCardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Zhichun GuDepartment of Pharmacy, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Yue QiDepartment of Epidemiology, The Key Laboratory of Remodeling-Related Cardiovascular Diseases, Ministry of Education, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yue WangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Mengru LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Xiaofan WuDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China. drwuxf@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4265-4240
Capital Medical University · CNCardiovascular Research Foundation · USShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough several meta-analyses have demonstrated the utility of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in guiding drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation compared to angiography-guidance, there has been a dearth of evidence in the left main coronary artery (LMCA) lesion subset.

methodsWe performed a meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes of IVUS versus conventional angiography guidance during implantation of DES for patients with LMCA disease. Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase were searched.

resultsA total of 1002 publications were reviewed; and finally, seven clinical studies - one prospective randomized controlled trial and six observational studies with 4592 patients (1907 IVUS-guided and 2685 angiography-guided) - were included in the meta-analysis. IVUS guidance was associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiac events (relative ratio [RR] 95% CI 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 0.70; P < 0.001), all-cause death (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.71; P < 0.001), cardiac death (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.62; P < 0.001), myocardial infarction (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.55 to 0.80; P < 0.001), and stent thrombosis (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.84; P = 0.01) compared with angiographic guidance. However, there was no significant difference regarding target lesion revascularization (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.31 to 1.18; P = 0.099) and target vessel revascularization (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.56; P = 0. 322).

conclusionsCompared to angiographic guidance, IVUS-guided DES implantation was associated with better clinical outcomes for patients with LMCA lesions, especially hard endpoints of death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyDrug-Eluting StentsUltrasonography, InterventionalAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary ThrombosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRadiography, InterventionalRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAngiographyDrug eluting stentIntravascular ultrasoundLeft main diseaseMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID29898668
PMCPMC6001000
OpenAlexW2808061397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.