ArticleCephalalgia : an international journal of headache2019
Topiramate is more effective than acetazolamide at lowering intracranial pressure.
Article in Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Topiramate Versus Acetazolamide in the Management of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: ASystematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Research trends of facial nerve injury after cerebellopontine angle tumor: CiteSpace-based bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- European headache federation guideline on idiopathic intracranial hypertension.The journal of headache and pain · 2018Guideline
- Cinnarizine vs. topiramate for migraine prophylaxis in children: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial.BMC neurology · 2026Trial
- Effect of glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide, used as an intracranial pressure lowering agent, on cognition in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Eye (London, England) · 2024Trial
- The effect of GLP-1RA exenatide on idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a randomized clinical trial.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Trial
- The Protective Role of Aquaporin 4 (AQP4) in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Yes or No?Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Review
- Topiramate Versus Acetazolamide for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. A Real-World Data-Based Multicenter Retrospective Study.Indian journal of pharmaceutical education : official publication of Association of Pharmaceutical Teachers of India · 2026Article
- Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in Children and Adolescents with Obesity: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Aberrant choroid plexus formation drives the development of treatment-related brain toxicity.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Progress and recognition of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A narrative review.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Review
- Reducing the global burden of cerebral venous thrombosis: An international research agenda.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024Review
- Review
- The Effects of Acetazolamide on Cerebral Hemodynamics in Adult Patients with an Acute Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a step change in understanding the disease mechanisms.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2023Review
- Overlap and Differences in Migraine and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Current pain and headache reports · 2023Review
- Article
- Glucocorticoids modify intracranial pressure in freely moving rats.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2023Article
- Reversible Bilateral Transverse Sinus Occlusion Treated by Lumboperitoneal Shunt in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Case Report.NMC case report journal · 2023Article
- Hemifacial spasm through changes of cerebrospinal fluid pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension focuses on reducing intracranial pressure to preserve vision and reduce headaches. There is sparse evidence to support the use of some of the drugs commonly used to manage idiopathic intracranial hypertension, therefore we propose to evaluate the efficacy of these drugs at lowering intracranial pressure in healthy rats.
methodsWe measured intracranial pressure in female rats before and after subcutaneous administration of acetazolamide, topiramate, furosemide, amiloride and octreotide at clinical doses (equivalent to a single human dose) and high doses (equivalent to a human daily dose). In addition, we measured intracranial pressure after oral administration of acetazolamide and topiramate.
resultsAt clinical and high doses, subcutaneous administration of topiramate lowered intracranial pressure by 32% ( p = 0.0009) and 21% ( p = 0.015) respectively. There was no significant reduction in intracranial pressure noted with acetazolamide, furosemide, amiloride or octreotide at any dose. Oral administration of topiramate significantly lowered intracranial pressure by 22% ( p = 0.018), compared to 5% reduction with acetazolamide ( p = >0.999).
conclusionOur in vivo studies demonstrated that both subcutaneous and oral administration of topiramate significantly lowers intracranial pressure. Other drugs tested, including acetazolamide, did not significantly reduce intracranial pressure. Future clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and side effects of topiramate in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients would be of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.