Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898387›Full record

ArticleCell reports2018

Genomic Knockout of Two Presumed Forelimb Tbx5 Enhancers Reveals They Are Nonessential for Limb Development.

Thomas J Cunningham, Joseph J Lancman, Marie Berenguer, P Duc Si Dong, Gregg Duester

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Tbx5 driveseLife · 2021
    Article
  18. Limb positioning and initiation: An evolutionary context of pattern and formation.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Enhancer redundancy in development and disease.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas J CunninghamDevelopment, Aging and Regeneration Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Joseph J LancmanHuman Genetics Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Marie BerenguerDevelopment, Aging and Regeneration Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
P Duc Si DongHuman Genetics Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Gregg DuesterDevelopment, Aging and Regeneration Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Electronic address: duester@sbpdiscovery.org.
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute · US

Funding

Factors Regulating Development of Appendicular Skeletal ProgenitorsR01AR067731 · NIAMS · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI DUESTER, GREGG L · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
Factors Regulating Development of Appendicular Skeletal ProgenitorsR56AR067731 · NIAMS · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI DUESTER, GREGG L · 2021 to 2021
$429k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR067731NIAMS NIH HHS R56 AR067731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A standard approach in the identification of transcriptional enhancers is the use of transgenic animals carrying DNA elements joined to reporter genes inserted randomly in the genome. We examined elements near Tbx5, a gene required for forelimb development in humans and other vertebrates. Previous transgenic studies reported a mammalian Tbx5 forelimb enhancer located in intron 2 containing a putative retinoic acid response element and a zebrafish tbx5a forelimb (pectoral fin) enhancer located downstream that is conserved from fish to mammals. We used CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to knockout the endogenous elements and unexpectedly found that deletion of the intron 2 and downstream elements, either singly or together in double knockouts, resulted in no effect on forelimb development. Our findings show that reporter transgenes may not identify endogenous enhancers and that in vivo genetic loss-of-function studies are required, such as CRISPR/Cas9, which is similar in effort to production of animals carrying reporter transgenes.

Indexed as

Gene EditingAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR-Cas SystemsEnhancer Elements, GeneticForelimbIntronsMiceT-Box Domain ProteinsZebrafishT-Box Domain ProteinsT-box transcription factor 5CRISPR/Cas9 gene editingenhancerlimb developmentmouseretinoic acid response elementTbx5zebrafish

Identifiers

PMID29898387
PMCPMC6034701
OpenAlexW2808504222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.