Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29898219›Full record

ArticleJAMA cardiology2018

Association of Patient Perceptions of Cardiovascular Risk and Beliefs on Statin Drugs With Racial Differences in Statin Use: Insights From the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management Registry.

Michael G Nanna, Ann Marie Navar, Pearl Zakroysky, Qun Xiang, Anne C Goldberg, Jennifer Robinson, Veronique L Roger, Salim S Virani, Peter W F Wilson, Joseph Elassal and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Electronic Health Record Alerts to Improve Lipid Lowering After a Recent Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026 · on this map
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sex differences in LDL-C genetic architecture and statin efficacy in All of Us.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Obicetrapib-the Rebirth of CETP Inhibitors?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michael G NannaDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Ann Marie NavarDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Pearl ZakroyskyDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Qun XiangDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Anne C GoldbergWashington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Jennifer RobinsonThe University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City.
Veronique L RogerMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Salim S ViraniBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Peter W F WilsonAtlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Joseph ElassalRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, New York.
L Veronica LeeSanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey.
Tracy Y WangDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Eric D PetersonDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Preventing Cardiovascular Disease through Improved Risk Prediction and CommunicationK01HL133416 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NAVAR, ANN MARIE · 2016 to 2020
$707k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL133416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: African American individuals face higher atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk than white individuals; reasons for these differences, including potential differences in patient beliefs regarding preventive care, remain unknown. Objective: To evaluate differences in statin use between white and African American patients and identify the potential causes for any observed differences. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using the 2015 Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management (PALM) Registry data, we compared statin use and dosing between African American and white outpatient adults who were potentially eligible for primary or secondary prevention statins. A total of 138 US community health care practices contributed to the data. Data analysis was conducted from March 2017 to May 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were use and dosing of statin therapy according to the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline by African American or white race. Secondary outcomes included lipid levels and patient-reported beliefs. Poisson regression was used to evaluate the association between race and statin undertreatment, a category combining people who were not taking a statin or those taking a dose intensity lower than recommended. Results: A total of 5689 patients (806 [14.2%] African American) in the PALM registry were eligible for statin therapy. African American individuals were less likely than white individuals to be treated with a statin (570/807 [70.6%] vs 3654/4883 [74.8%]; P = .02). Among those treated, African American patients were less likely than white patients to receive a statin at guideline-recommended intensity (269 [33.3%] vs 2145 [43.9%], respectively; P < .001; relative risk, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.00-1.15]; P = .05, after adjustment for demographic and clinical factors). The median (interquartile range) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of patients receiving treatment were higher among African American than white individuals (97.0 [76.0-121.0] mg/dL vs 85.0 [68.0-105.0] mg/dL; P < .001). African American individuals were less likely than white individuals to believe statins were safe (292 [36.2%] vs 2800 [57.3%]; P < .001) or effective (564 [70.0%] vs 3635 [74.4%]; P = .008) and were less likely to trust their clinician (663 [82.3%] vs 4579 [93.8%]; P < .001). Group differences in statin undertreatment were not significant after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and clinician factors, socioeconomic status, and patient beliefs (final adjusted relative risk, 1.03 [95% CI 0.96-1.11]; P = .35). Conclusions and Relevance: African American individuals were less likely to receive guideline-recommended statin therapy. Demographic, clinical, socioeconomic, belief-related, and clinician differences contributed to observed differences and represent potential targets for intervention.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthBlack or African AmericanRegistriesWhite PeopleAgedAtherosclerosisCholesterol, LDLFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealthcare DisparitiesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHyperlipidemiasMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID29898219
PMCPMC6656582

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.