ReviewJournal of neurophysiology2018
Stimulus-dependent engagement of neural mechanisms for reliable motion detection in the mouse retina.
Review in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conservation of retinal direction-selective circuits across vertebrate species.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2026Review
- The mysterious middlemen making your vision pop: understanding the function of amacrine cells.The Journal of physiology · 2025Review
- Compartmentalized pooling generates orientation selectivity in wide-field amacrine cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Center-surround interactions underlie bipolar cell motion sensitivity in the mouse retina.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Distinct inhibitory pathways control velocity and directional tuning in the mouse retina.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Realistic retinal modeling unravels the differential role of excitation and inhibition to starburst amacrine cells in direction selectivity.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Synaptic inputs to broad thorny ganglion cells in macaque retina.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2021Article
- Cortical synaptic architecture supports flexible sensory computations.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2020Review
- Neural mechanisms of contextual modulation in the retinal direction selective circuit.Nature communications · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Direction selectivity is a fundamental computation in the visual system and is first computed by the direction-selective circuit in the mammalian retina. Although landmark discoveries on the neural basis of direction selectivity have been made in the rabbit, many technological advances designed for the mouse have emerged, making this organism a favored model for investigating the direction-selective circuit at the molecular, synaptic, and network levels. Studies using diverse motion stimuli in the mouse retina demonstrate that retinal direction selectivity is implemented by multilayered mechanisms. This review begins with a set of central mechanisms that are engaged under a wide range of visual conditions and then focuses on additional layers of mechanisms that are dynamically recruited under different visual stimulus conditions. Together, recent findings allude to an emerging theme: robust motion detection in the natural environment requires flexible neural mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.