Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29897677›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2019

Harnessing microfluidic streak plate technique to investigate the gut microbiome of Reticulitermes chinensis.

Nan Zhou, Yu-Tong Sun, Dong-Wei Chen, Wenbin Du, Hong Yang, Shuang-Jiang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Research progress in isolation and identification of rumen probiotics.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  6. [Application of Droplet-Based Microfluidics in Microbial Research].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Diversity of Bacterial Biota inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nan ZhouState Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources and Environmental Microbiology Research Center at, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2175-2434
Yu-Tong SunState Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources and Environmental Microbiology Research Center at, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dong-Wei ChenState Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources and Environmental Microbiology Research Center at, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wenbin DuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources and Environmental Microbiology Research Center at, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hong YangSchool of Life Sciences at Central, China Normal University, Wuhan, China.
Shuang-Jiang LiuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources and Environmental Microbiology Research Center at, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The termite gut microbiome is a model system to investigate microbial interactions and their associations with host. For decades, extensive research with molecular tools and conventional cultivation method has been carried out to define the microbial diversity in termite gut. Yet, many bacterial groups of the termite gut microbiome have not been successfully cultivated in laboratory. In this study, we adapted the recently developed microfluidic streak plate (MSP) technique for cultivation of termite gut microbial communities at both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. We found that 99 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were cultivable by MSP approach and 18 OTUs were documented first time for termite gut microbiota. Further analysis of the bacterial diversities derived by culture-dependent MSP approach and culture-independent 16S rRNA gene typing revealed that both methods have bias in recovery of gut microbiota. In total 396 strains were isolated with MSP technique, and potential new taxa at species and/or genus levels were obtained that were phylogenetically related to Burkholderia, Micrococcus, and Dysgonomonas. Results from this study indicate that MSP technique is applicable for cultivating previously unknown and new microbial groups of termite gut microbiota.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAerobiosisAnaerobiosisAnimalsBacteriaCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalIsopteraMicrobiological TechniquesMicrofluidicsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbacterial diversitycultivationgut microbiomemicrofluidic streak plate (MSP)Reticulitermes chinensis

Identifiers

PMID29897677
PMCPMC6436436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.