Observational studyJournal of the National Cancer Institute2019
Association Between Autologous Stem Cell Transplant and Survival Among Californians With Multiple Myeloma.
Observational study in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment benefit of upfront autologous stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2023Pooled it
- "I Missed My Other Oncologist": Established Relationships as Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing CAR-T and Autologous Transplantation.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Multiple myeloma care, treatment patterns, and treatment durations in academic and community care settings.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Utilization of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Over Time in Multiple Myeloma: A Population-Based Study.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2024Article
- Real-world multiple myeloma front-line treatment and outcomes by transplant in the United States.EJHaem · 2023Article
- Impact of second primary malignancy post-autologous transplantation on outcomes of multiple myeloma: a CIBMTR analysis.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Characteristics and Risk Factors of Ultra-High-Risk Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- The limited use of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant for fit older patients with multiple myeloma in India: a retrospective analysis.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2022Article
- Real-world utilisation of ASCT in multiple myeloma (MM): a report from the Australian and New Zealand myeloma and related diseases registry (MRDR).Bone marrow transplantation · 2021Article
- Front-line treatment patterns in multiple myeloma: An analysis of U.S.-based electronic health records from 2011 to 2019.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Multiple myeloma, race, insurance and treatment.Cancer epidemiology · 2021Article
- Current Approach to Managing Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2021Review
- Effect of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant on the development of second primary malignancies in multiple myeloma patients.Blood cancer journal · 2021Observational
- Socioeconomic Status is Globally a Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival of Multiple Myeloma Patients: Synthesis of Studies and Review of the Literature.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2021Review
- Current diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment paradigms in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.Cancer treatment and research communications · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (aHSCT) is an efficacious treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. However, as rapid advances have resulted in other highly efficacious and less intensive therapies, the role of aHSCT has been questioned. Methods: We utilized population-based data to identify 13 494 newly diagnosed patients younger than age 80 years between 1998 and 2012. Patient characteristics of aHSCT and non-aHSCT groups were balanced using inverse probability weighting of a propensity score predicting aHSCT use. Multivariable models adjusted for baseline comorbidities, demographics, and socioeconomic status estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of death. Results: Twenty point eight percent (2807) of patients underwent aHSCT, and this rate increased over time from 15.4% in 1998-2002 to 23.9% in 2008-2012. aHSCT was utilized among 37.6% and 11.5% of patients younger than age 60 years and 60 to 79 years, respectively. The median time to aHSCT was 9.4 months, and 89% of all aHSCTs occurred within two years of diagnosis. The median overall survival from time of aHSCT was 72.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 68 to 78). Autologous HSCT at any time was associated with improved survival (aHR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.92). Among aHSCT recipients, transplant more than 12 months after diagnosis (vs ≤12 months) was associated with worse survival (aHR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.51). The positive effect of aHSCT on overall survival was similar across study time periods and age groups. Conclusion: In the era of highly efficacious induction therapies, aHSCT remained infrequently used but continued to be associated with improved survival for multiple myeloma patients and should be considered for newly diagnosed patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.