ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
Identifying tweets of personal health experience through word embedding and LSTM neural network.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using transformer-based models and social media posts for heat stroke detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Internet-based surveillance to track trends in seasonal allergies across the United States.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Topics and Sentiment Surrounding Vaping on Twitter and Reddit During the 2019 e-Cigarette and Vaping Use-Associated Lung Injury Outbreak: Comparative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- COVID-19 personal health mention detection from tweets using dual convolutional neural network.Expert systems with applications · 2022Article
- Automated Detection of Vaping-Related Tweets on Twitter During the 2019 EVALI Outbreak Using Machine Learning Classification.Frontiers in big data · 2022Article
- Classifying patient and professional voice in social media health posts.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- An investigation into the deep learning approach in sentimental analysis using graph-based theories.PloS one · 2021Article
- Twitter Health Surveillance (THS) System.Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs Twitter has become an active data source for health surveillance research, it is important that efficient and effective methods are developed to identify tweets related to personal health experience. Conventional classification algorithms rely on features engineered by human domain experts, and engineering such features is a challenging task and requires much human intelligence. The resultant features may not be optimal for the classification problem, and can make it challenging for conventional classifiers to correctly predict personal experience tweets (PETs) due to the various ways to express and/or describe personal experience in tweets. In this study, we developed a method that combines word embedding and long short-term memory (LSTM) model without the need to engineer any specific features. Through word embedding, tweet texts were represented as dense vectors which in turn were fed to the LSTM neural network as sequences.
resultsStatistical analyses of the results of 10-fold cross-validations of our method and conventional methods indicate that there exist significant differences (p < 0.01) in performance measures of accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC/AUC, demonstrating that our approach outperforms the conventional methods in identifying PETs.
conclusionWe presented an efficient and effective method of identifying health-related personal experience tweets by combining word embedding and an LSTM neural network. It is conceivable that our method can help accelerate and scale up analyzing textual data of social media for health surveillance purposes, because of no need for the laborious and costly process of engineering features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.