Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29896599›Full record

ArticlePhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2018

Comparing alchemical and physical pathway methods for computing the absolute binding free energy of charged ligands.

Nanjie Deng, Di Cui, Bin W Zhang, Junchao Xia, Jeffrey Cruz, Ronald Levy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dummy Atoms in Alchemical Free Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nanjie DengDepartment of Chemistry and Physical Sciences, Pace University, New York, NY 10038, USA. nanjie.deng@gmail.com.
Di Cui
Bin W Zhang
Junchao Xia
Jeffrey Cruz
Ronald Levy

Funding

X-ray Crystallographic Fragment Screening CoreU54AI150472 · NIAID · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI SARAFIANOS, STEFAN G, TORBETT, BRUCE EDWARD · 2019 to 2021
$15.7M
DYNAMICS OF PEPTIDES AND PROTEINSR01GM030580 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI LEVY, RONALD · 1985 to 2018
$6.1M
NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI150472NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately predicting absolute binding free energies of protein-ligand complexes is important as a fundamental problem in both computational biophysics and pharmaceutical discovery. Calculating binding free energies for charged ligands is generally considered to be challenging because of the strong electrostatic interactions between the ligand and its environment in aqueous solution. In this work, we compare the performance of the potential of mean force (PMF) method and the double decoupling method (DDM) for computing absolute binding free energies for charged ligands. We first clarify an unresolved issue concerning the explicit use of the binding site volume to define the complexed state in DDM together with the use of harmonic restraints. We also provide an alternative derivation for the formula for absolute binding free energy using the PMF approach. We use these formulas to compute the binding free energy of charged ligands at an allosteric site of HIV-1 integrase, which has emerged in recent years as a promising target for developing antiviral therapy. As compared with the experimental results, the absolute binding free energies obtained by using the PMF approach show unsigned errors of 1.5-3.4 kcal mol-1, which are somewhat better than the results from DDM (unsigned errors of 1.6-4.3 kcal mol-1) using the same amount of CPU time. According to the DDM decomposition of the binding free energy, the ligand binding appears to be dominated by nonpolar interactions despite the presence of very large and favorable intermolecular ligand-receptor electrostatic interactions, which are almost completely cancelled out by the equally large free energy cost of desolvation of the charged moiety of the ligands in solution. We discuss the relative strengths of computing absolute binding free energies using the alchemical and physical pathway methods.

Identifiers

PMID29896599
PMCPMC6061996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.