Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29896571›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2018

Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient?

Thaddaeus Tan Jun Kiat, Sivaraj K Gunasekaran, Sameer P Junnarkar, Jee Keem Low, Winston Woon, Vishal G Shelat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Heart rate variability in acute pancreatitis: a narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Predicting Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thaddaeus Tan Jun KiatYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Sivaraj K GunasekaranDepartment of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Sameer P JunnarkarDepartment of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Jee Keem LowDepartment of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Winston WoonDepartment of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Vishal G ShelatDepartment of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS/

aimsRanson's score (RS) and Glasgow score (GS) have been utilized to stratify the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). The aim of this study was to validate RS and GS for stratifying the severity of acute pancreatitis and audit our experience of managing AP.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of patients treated for AP from July 2009 to September 2016. Final severity was determined using the revised Atlanta classification. Mortality and complications were analyzed.

resultsFrom July 2009 to September 2016, a total of 675 patients with a diagnosis of AP were admitted at the hospital. Of them, 669 patients who had sufficient data were analyzed. Their average age±SD was 58.7±17.4 years (range, 21-98 years). There was a male preponderance (n=393, 53.8%). A total of 82 (12.3%) patients had eventual severe pancreatitis. RS demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 52.8% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 21.5% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.1%. GS demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.8% and a specificity of 69.2% with a PPV of 25.8% and a NPV of 95.5%. For severity prediction, areas under the curve (AUCs) for RS and GS were 0.848 (95% CI: 0.819-0.875) and 0.784 (95% CI: 0.750-0.814), respectively (

conclusionsRS has higher sensitivity, NPV and AUC for predicting severity of AP than GS.

Indexed as

Glasgow scoreRanson scoreScoringSevere acute pancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID29896571
PMCPMC5981140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.