ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Randomized clinical trial of physiological ischemic training for patients with coronary heart disease complicated with heart failure: Safety of training, VEGF of peripheral blood and quality of life.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- An evidence-based guide to the efficacy and safety of isometric resistance training in hypertension and clinical implications.Clinical hypertension · 2023Review
- Physiological ischemic training improves cardiac function through the attenuation of cardiomyocyte apoptosis and the activation of the vagus nerve in chronic heart failure.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Roles of isometric contraction training in promoting neuroprotection and angiogenesis after stroke in adult rats.Physiological research · 2022Article
- The acute and long-term effects of a cardiac rehabilitation program on endothelial progenitor cells in chronic heart failure patients: Comparing two different exercise training protocols.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2021Article
- MiR-25 exerts cardioprotective effect in a rat model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by targeting high-mobility group box 1.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2020Article
- Evaluation of the effects of different treatment modalities on angiogenesis in heart failure patients with reduced/mid-range ejection fraction via VEGF and sVEGFR-1.Saudi medical journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effects of a 12-week physiological ischemic training (PIT) programme on safety of training and quality of life (QOL) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) complicated with heart failure were evaluated. A total of 30 patients with CHD complicated with heart failure were randomized to either an intervention group (n=15) or to controls (n=15) after baseline testing. A 12-week, 5 times a week, maximum subjective force group PIT was conducted. Safety of the training was measured with ECG and heart rate and blood pressure, QOL was measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was measured with peripheral blood. VEGF and MLHFQ were improved in the intervention group. The finding of the study shows PIT is safe to patients with CHD complicated with heart failure by improving VEGF of peripheral blood and QOL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.