Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29896033›Full record

ArticleP & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management2018

Big Data and Pharmacovigilance: Data Mining for Adverse Drug Events and Interactions.

C Lee Ventola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A real-world pharmacovigilance study of abaloparatide based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C Lee Ventola

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adverse drug events (ADEs), including drug interactions, have a tremendous impact on patient health and generate substantial health care costs. A "big data" approach to pharmacovigilance involves the identification of drug-ADE associations by data mining various electronic sources, including: adverse event reports, the medical literature, electronic health records, and social media. This approach has been useful in assisting the Food and Drug Administration and other regulatory agencies in monitoring and decision-making regarding drug safety. Data mining can also assist pharmaceutical companies in drug safety surveillance efforts, adhering to risk management plans, and gathering real-world evidence to supplement clinical trial data. The use of data mining for pharmacovigilance purposes provides many unique benefits; however, it also presents many challenges. This paper explores the methods and sources of "big data" and how this is contributing to pharmacovigilance efforts.

Identifiers

PMID29896033
PMCPMC5969211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.