Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29896018›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma

MR imaging of BioCartilage augmented microfracture surgery utilizing 2D MOCART and KOOS scores.

Aaron H Carter, Nicholas Guttierez, Ty K Subhawong, H T Temple, Bryson P Lesniak, Michael G Baraga, Jean Jose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MUW researcher of the month.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aaron H CarterUHealth Sports Medicine and Wellness Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Nicholas GuttierezDepartment of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Division, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Ty K SubhawongUHealth Sports Medicine and Wellness Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
H T TempleNOVA Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States.
Bryson P LesniakUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Michael G BaragaUHealth Sports Medicine and Wellness Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Jean JoseUHealth Sports Medicine and Wellness Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBioCartilage is a novel scaffold-based microfracture augmentation technique that has been shown to aid in chondrogenic differentiation of adult progenitor cells resulting in formation of more hyaline-like cartilage. As this cartilage repair technique becomes more commonplace, it is essential that the musculoskeletal radiologist and orthopedic surgeon gain familiarity with the surgical technique and its post-operative MR imaging findings.

methodsWe present several case studies regarding MRI findings (modified clinical 2D MOCART) and clinical outcome (KOOS) scores in patients who have undergone this novel surgical procedure. For data analysis KOOS scores where dichotomized to scores greater or less than 80, and MOCART scores were dichotomized to scores greater or less than 50. A fisher exact test was then performed to determine if there was any correlation between parameters of the modified 2D MOCART and KOOS scores (Tables 2 and 3).

resultsMarrow elements travel through the microfracture holes and interact with the scaffold created by BioCartilage, rather than creating their own fibrin scaffold, as is typically anticipated from a marrow stimulation procedure. Interestingly, the amount defect fill, presence of an intact surface, intact subchondral bone, or lack of effusion did not correlate with positive outcomes. Parameters that trended towards significance included presence of adhesions and subchondral lamina. Completeness of cartilage interface, homogeneity, and signal intensity also failed to reach statistical significance. In our experience, patients that demonstrated mild repair tissue surface irregularity, but with preservation of greater than 50% thickness compared to surrounding native cartilage, mild irregularity of subchondral plate, with vertical low signal intensity lines (sequela of prior microfracture surgery), and mild or no bone marrow edema pattern demonstrated higher KOOS scores.

conclusionBiocartilage in conjunction with microfracture is an encouraging cartilage restoration technique that promotes regeneration of more robust hyaline-like cartilage compared to the fibrocartilage formed after conventional microfracture. The T2 mapping properties of the repair tissue after successful BioCartilage augmented microfracture surgery are very similar to that of the adjacent native cartilage. Although there appear to be characteristic trends in a successful repair, further research is warranted to elucidate any correlations between specific characteristics of the repair and patient clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

BioCartilageFibrocartilageKOOSMOCARTMRI

Identifiers

PMID29896018
PMCPMC5995692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.