Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29895989›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2018

Gut bacterial and fungal communities of the domesticated silkworm (Bombyx mori) and wild mulberry-feeding relatives.

Bosheng Chen, Kaiqian Du, Chao Sun, Arunprasanna Vimalanathan, Xili Liang, Yong Li, Baohong Wang, Xingmeng Lu, Lanjuan Li, Yongqi Shao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed
19.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 274 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gut microbiome of the grape berry moth,Microbial genomics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparative analysis of gut microbiota inOpen veterinary journal · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Life inside a bag: multiomics insights into the bagworm species Eumeta crameri.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025
    Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bosheng ChenInstitute of Sericulture and Apiculture, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Kaiqian DuInstitute of Sericulture and Apiculture, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Chao SunAnalysis Center of Agrobiology and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Arunprasanna VimalanathanInstitute of Sericulture and Apiculture, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xili LiangInstitute of Sericulture and Apiculture, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yong LiInstitute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4038-0493
Baohong WangNational Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3767-7782
Xingmeng LuInstitute of Sericulture and Apiculture, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Lanjuan LiNational Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yongqi ShaoInstitute of Sericulture and Apiculture, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. yshao@zju.edu.cn.
Zhejiang University · CNState Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious DiseasesMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bombyx mori, the domesticated silkworm, is of great importance as a silk producer and as a powerful experimental model for the basic and applied research. Similar to other animals, abundant microorganisms live inside the silkworm gut; however, surprisingly, the microbiota of this model insect has not been well characterized to date. Here, we comprehensively characterized the gut microbiota of the domesticated silkworm and its wild relatives. Comparative analyses with the mulberry-feeding moths Acronicta major and Diaphania pyloalis revealed a highly diverse but distinctive silkworm gut microbiota despite thousands of years of domestication, and stage-specific signatures in both total (DNA-based) and active (RNA-based) bacterial populations, dominated by the phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. Most fungal sequences were assigned to the phyla Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. Environmental factors, including diet and human manipulation (egg production), likely influence the silkworm gut composition. Despite a lack of spatial variation along the gut, microbial community shifts were apparent between early instars and late instars, in concert with host developmental changes. Our results demonstrate that the gut microbiota of silkworms assembles into increasingly identical community throughout development, which differs greatly from those of other mulberry-feeding lepidopterans from the same niche, highlighting host-specific effects on microbial associations and the potential roles these communities play in host biology.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaBombyxDomesticationFungiMorusMoths

Identifiers

PMID29895989
PMCPMC6092317
OpenAlexW2808454661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.