Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29895931›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2019

A phase IV, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial comparing efficacy and systemic exposure for a standard weight-based dose versus a fixed dose of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF in patients with Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma weighing ≤70 kg.

John Kuruvilla, Cheng-Hwai Tzeng, Seok-Goo Cho, Seok Jin Kim, Jih-Luh Tang, Yaming Su, Jingyang Wu, Rita Vargo, Peter Cheverton

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John KuruvillaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada. john.kuruvilla@uhn.on.ca.
Cheng-Hwai TzengTaipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Seok-Goo ChoCatholic Medical Centre St Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5429-4839
Seok Jin KimSamsung Medical Centre, Seoul, Korea.
Jih-Luh TangNational Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yaming SuSanofi Oncology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jingyang WuSanofi Oncology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Rita VargoSanofi Oncology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Peter ChevertonSanofi Oncology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A randomized, multicenter, open-label study explored the effect of a fixed-dose (FD) of plerixafor versus the approved weight-based (WB) dose for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and a body weight of ≤70 kg. After mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 μg/kg/day for 4 days, patients were randomized 1:1 to either plerixafor FD 20 mg (n = 30) or WB 0.24 mg/kg (n = 31) on the evening of Day 4. Co-primary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving ≥5 × 10

Indexed as

Body WeightDrug Dosage CalculationsAdultAntigens, CD34Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzylaminesCyclamsFemaleGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHeterocyclic CompoundsHumansLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMaleMiddle AgedAntigens, CD34BenzylaminesCyclamsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHeterocyclic Compoundsplerixafor

Identifiers

PMID29895931
PMCPMC6365372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.