Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29895901›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Achieving high permeability and enhanced selectivity for Angstrom-scale separations using artificial water channel membranes.

Yue-Xiao Shen, Woochul Song, D Ryan Barden, Tingwei Ren, Chao Lang, Hasin Feroz, Codey B Henderson, Patrick O Saboe, Daniel Tsai, Hengjing Yan and 7 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Highly Selective Bioinspired Peptide Channels for Rapid Water Transport.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Learning the relationship between nanoscale chemical patterning and hydrophobicity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. ScatteringNanoscale advances · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yue-Xiao ShenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Woochul SongDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
D Ryan BardenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA.
Tingwei RenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Chao LangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Hasin FerozDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Codey B HendersonDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Patrick O SaboeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Daniel TsaiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Hengjing YanCenter for Polymers and Organic Solids, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
Peter J ButlerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Guillermo C BazanCenter for Polymers and Organic Solids, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2537-0310
William A PhillipDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Robert J HickeyDepartment of Material Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Paul S CremerDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Harish VashisthDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2087-2880
Manish KumarDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. manish.kumar@psu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5545-3793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic polymer membranes, critical to diverse energy-efficient separations, are subject to permeability-selectivity trade-offs that decrease their overall efficacy. These trade-offs are due to structural variations (e.g., broad pore size distributions) in both nonporous membranes used for Angstrom-scale separations and porous membranes used for nano to micron-scale separations. Biological membranes utilize well-defined Angstrom-scale pores to provide exceptional transport properties and can be used as inspiration to overcome this trade-off. Here, we present a comprehensive demonstration of such a bioinspired approach based on pillar[5]arene artificial water channels, resulting in artificial water channel-based block copolymer membranes. These membranes have a sharp selectivity profile with a molecular weight cutoff of ~ 500 Da, a size range challenging to achieve with current membranes, while achieving a large improvement in permeability (~65 L m

Indexed as

Membranes, ArtificialMolecular Dynamics SimulationAquaporinsComputer SimulationDetergentsLipid BilayersLiposomesMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionMolecular WeightPermeabilityPolymersPorositySaltsWaterAquaporinsDetergentsLipid BilayersLiposomesMembranes, ArtificialPolymersSaltsWater

Identifiers

PMID29895901
PMCPMC5997692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.