Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29895881›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2018

Validity and internal consistency of the French version of the revised Skin Management Needs Assessment Checklist in people with spinal cord injury.

Anthony Gélis, Arnaud Dupeyron, Jean Pierre Daures, David Goossens, Dominique Gault, Jean Paul Pedelucq, Michel Enjalbert, Eric Maupas, Paul Kennedy, Charles Fattal and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anthony GélisCentre de Rééducation Neurologique Mutualiste Propara, Parc Euromédecine, Montpellier, France. a.gelis@propara.fr.
Arnaud DupeyronDépartement de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes, France.
Jean Pierre DauresInstitut Universitaire de Recherche Clinique, Montpellier, France.
David GoossensCentre de rééducation de la Tour de Gassies, Bruges, France.
Dominique GaultCentre de rééducation Clemenceau, Strasbourg, France.
Jean Paul PedelucqCentre de Rééducation Fonctionnelle de Kerpape, Ploemeur, France.
Michel EnjalbertCentre de Rééducation Bouffard Vercelli, Cerbere, France.
Eric MaupasCentreMutualiste de rééducation, Albi, France.
Paul KennedyDepartment of Clinical Psychology, National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Charles FattalCentre de reeducation fonctionnelle La Chataigneraie, Menucourt, France.
French SMNAC Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designCross-sectional psychometrics study.

objectivesTo determine the construct validity and internal consistency of the revised Skin Management Needs Assessment Checklist (revised SMnac).

settingSix spinal cord rehabilitation centers.

methodsOne-hundred and thirty-two community-dwelling individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) were included. Construct validity was assessed by a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the revised SMnac and several questionnaires: Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Ways of Coping Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Braden scale; or clinical variables: educational level, presence of a pressure ulcer (PU), history of multiple PUs, time since injury, and pain.

resultsThe study evidenced construct validity with a fair to moderate correlation coefficient between the revised SMnac and Rosenberg scale (r

conclusionThese results show that the revised SMnac is a valid tool to assess PU self-management in individuals with SCI. Further studies are needed to assess the revised SMnac's responsiveness to change.

Indexed as

ChecklistNeeds AssessmentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSelf-ManagementSkin DiseasesSpinal Cord InjuriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29895881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.