Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29895853›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2019

Genome-wide sequencing in acutely ill infants: genomic medicine's critical application?

Jan M Friedman, Yvonne Bombard, Martina C Cornel, Conrad V Fernandez, Anne K Junker, Sharon E Plon, Zornitza Stark, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Paediatric Task Team of the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health Regulatory and Ethics Work Stream

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How Neonatologists Use Genetic Information.The Journal of pediatrics · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Hospital-level variation in genetic testing in children's hospitals' neonatal intensive care units from 2016 to 2021.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Perspectives of United States neonatologists on genetic testing practices.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
  14. Genome sequencing as a first-line diagnostic test for hospitalized infants.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Parental Attitudes Toward Clinical Genomic Sequencing in Children With Critical Cardiac Disease.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Exome sequencing compared with standard genetic tests for critically ill infants with suspected genetic conditions.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jan M FriedmanDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. jan.friedman@ubc.ca.
Yvonne BombardLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Martina C CornelDepartment of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Conrad V FernandezIWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Anne K JunkerDepartment of Pediatrics, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sharon E PlonDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics and Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Zornitza StarkVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Bartha Maria KnoppersCentre of Genomics and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Paediatric Task Team of the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health Regulatory and Ethics Work Stream

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic genome-wide sequencing (exome or genome sequencing and data analysis for high-penetrance disease-causing variants) in acutely ill infants appears to be clinically useful, but the value of this diagnostic test should be rigorously demonstrated before it is accepted as a standard of care. This white paper was developed by the Paediatric Task Team of the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health's Regulatory and Ethics Work Stream to address the question of how we can determine the clinical value of genome-wide sequencing in infants in an intensive care setting. After reviewing available clinical and ethics literature on this question, we conclude that evaluating diagnostic genome-wide sequencing as a comprehensive scan for major genetic disease (rather than as a large panel of single-gene tests) provides a practical approach to assessing its clinical value in acutely ill infants. Comparing the clinical value of diagnostic genome-wide sequencing to chromosomal microarray analysis, the current evidence-based standard of care, per case of serious genetic disease diagnosed provides a practical means of assessing clinical value. Scientifically rigorous studies of this kind are needed to determine if clinical genome-wide sequencing should be established as a standard of care supported by healthcare systems and insurers for diagnosis of genetic disease in seriously ill newborn infants.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineGenetic TestingIntensive Care, NeonatalWhole Genome SequencingAcute DiseaseHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesPenetranceExome sequencinggenome sequencingHealth policyNeonatal intensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID29895853
PMCPMC6752673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.