Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29895820›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2018

Ischemia-reperfusion injury and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after deceased donor liver transplantation.

Michał Grąt, Marek Krawczyk, Karolina M Wronka, Jan Stypułkowski, Zbigniew Lewandowski, Michał Wasilewicz, Piotr Krawczyk, Karolina Grąt, Waldemar Patkowski, Krzysztof Zieniewicz

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Risk Factors of Positive Resection Margin in Hepatectomy for Resectable Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Risk Prediction and Prognosis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michał GrątDepartment of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. michal.grat@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3372-3072
Marek KrawczykDepartment of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Karolina M WronkaHepatology and Internal Medicine Unit, Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Jan StypułkowskiDepartment of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Zbigniew LewandowskiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Michał WasilewiczHepatology and Internal Medicine Unit, Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr KrawczykDepartment of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Karolina GrątSecond Department of Clinical Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Waldemar PatkowskiDepartment of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof ZieniewiczDepartment of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation. Data of 195 patients were retrospectively analysed. Post-reperfusion aspartate (AST), alanine transaminase, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were the primary measures of IRI. Tumour recurrence was the primary endpoint. Post-reperfusion AST was a continuous risk factor for tumour recurrence in patients within Milan criteria (p = 0.035), with an optimal cut-off of 1896 U/L. Recurrence-free survival of patients within Milan criteria and post-reperfusion AST of <1896 and ≥1896 U/L was 96.6% and 71.9% at 5 and 3.7 years, respectively (p = 0.006). Additionally, post-reperfusion AST and LDH exceeding the upper quartile significantly increased the risk of HCC recurrence in patients within Milan criteria (p = 0.039, hazard ratio [HR] = 5.99 and p = 0.040, HR = 6.08, respectively) and to a lesser extent, in patients within Up-to-7 criteria (p = 0.028, HR = 3.58 and p = 0.039, HR = 3.33, respectively). No other significant IRI effects were found in patients beyond the Up-to-7 criteria and in analyses stratified for independent risk factors for recurrence: tumour number and differentiation, alpha-fetoprotein, and microvascular invasion. Thus, IRI exerts major negative effects on the risk of HCC recurrence after liver transplantation in patients within standard and extended criteria.

Indexed as

Reperfusion InjuryAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesCarcinoma, HepatocellularDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationLiving DonorsL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesL-Lactate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID29895820
PMCPMC5997656
OpenAlexW2806735573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.