Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29895692›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Unique function words characterize genomic proteins.

Andrea Scaiewicz, Michael Levitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Analysis ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Improved RAD51 binders through motif shuffling based on the modularity of BRC repeats.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Grammar of protein domain architectures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrea ScaiewiczDepartment of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 michael.levitt@stanford.edu scaiewicz@stanford.edu.
Michael LevittDepartment of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 michael.levitt@stanford.edu scaiewicz@stanford.edu.

Funding

Emergent Properties of Complex Systems: From Atoms to Macromolecules; from Humans to SocietiesR35GM122543 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL LEVITT · 2017 to 2026
$5.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Between 2009 and 2016 the number of protein sequences from known species increased 10-fold from 8 million to 85 million. About 80% of these sequences contain at least one region recognized by the conserved domain architecture retrieval tool (CDART) as a sequence motif. Motifs provide clues to biological function but CDART often matches the same region of a protein by two or more profiles. Such synonyms complicate estimates of functional complexity. We do full-linkage clustering of redundant profiles by finding maximum disjoint cliques: Each cluster is replaced by a single representative profile to give what we term a unique function word (UFW). From 2009 to 2016, the number of sequence profiles used by CDART increased by 80%; the number of UFWs increased more slowly by 30%, indicating that the number of UFWs may be saturating. The number of sequences matched by a single UFW (sequences with single domain architectures) increased as slowly as the number of different words, whereas the number of sequences matched by a combination of two or more UFWs in sequences with multiple domain architectures (MDAs) increased at the same rate as the total number of sequences. This combinatorial arrangement of a limited number of UFWs in MDAs accounts for the genomic diversity of protein sequences. Although eukaryotes and prokaryotes use very similar sets of "words" or UFWs (57% shared), the "sentences" (MDAs) are different (1.3% shared).

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceGenomicsProtein DomainsSoftwareAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceCluster AnalysisDatabases, FactualHumansSequence AlignmentSequence Homology, Amino AcidStructure-Activity Relationshipdomain architecturefunctional profilesgenomic sequencesprotein universeshared function

Identifiers

PMID29895692
PMCPMC6042118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.