Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29895687›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Microfluidic chambers using fluid walls for cell biology.

Cristian Soitu, Alexander Feuerborn, Ann Na Tan, Henry Walker, Pat A Walsh, Alfonso A Castrejón-Pita, Peter R Cook, Edmond J Walsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Interfacial tension driven open droplet microfluidics.Advanced materials interfaces · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cristian SoituDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, OX2 0ES Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alexander FeuerbornSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, OX1 3RE Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ann Na TanSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, OX1 3RE Oxford, United Kingdom.
Henry WalkeriotaSciences Ltd., OX5 1PF Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Pat A WalshBernal Institute, School of Engineering, University of Limerick, Castletroy, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland.
Alfonso A Castrejón-PitaDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, OX1 3PJ Oxford, United Kingdom.
Peter R CookSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, OX1 3RE Oxford, United Kingdom; peter.cook@path.ox.ac.uk edmond.walsh@eng.ox.ac.uk.
Edmond J WalshDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, OX2 0ES Oxford, United Kingdom; peter.cook@path.ox.ac.uk edmond.walsh@eng.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MC_PC_15029Medical Research Council MR/K010867/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many proofs of concept have demonstrated the potential of microfluidics in cell biology. However, the technology remains inaccessible to many biologists, as it often requires complex manufacturing facilities (such as soft lithography) and uses materials foreign to cell biology (such as polydimethylsiloxane). Here, we present a method for creating microfluidic environments by simply reshaping fluids on a substrate. For applications in cell biology, we use cell media on a virgin Petri dish overlaid with an immiscible fluorocarbon. A hydrophobic/fluorophilic stylus then reshapes the media into any pattern by creating liquid walls of fluorocarbon. Microfluidic arrangements suitable for cell culture are made in minutes using materials familiar to biologists. The versatility of the method is demonstrated by creating analogs of a common platform in cell biology, the microtiter plate. Using this vehicle, we demonstrate many manipulations required for cell culture and downstream analysis, including feeding, replating, cloning, cryopreservation, lysis plus RT-PCR, transfection plus genome editing, and fixation plus immunolabeling (when fluid walls are reconfigured during use). We also show that mammalian cells grow and respond to stimuli normally, and worm eggs develop into adults. This simple approach provides biologists with an entrée into microfluidics.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesCell BiologyCytological TechniquesMicrofluidic Analytical Techniquesfluid wallsinterfacial tensionmicrofluidicssessile dropstissue culture

Identifiers

PMID29895687
PMCPMC6042120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.