Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29895653›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Effectiveness of the Gold Standard Programme (GSP) for smoking cessation on smokers with and without a severe mental disorder: a Danish cohort study.

Mette Rasmussen, Mads Klinge, Jesper Krogh, Merete Nordentoft, Hanne Tønnesen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. IntensiveEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mette RasmussenClinical Health Promotion Centre, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2847-1544
Mads KlingeClinical Health Promotion Centre, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper KroghMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
Merete NordentoftMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
Hanne TønnesenClinical Health Promotion Centre, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKFrederiksberg Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe compared the effectiveness of an intensive smoking cessation intervention among smokers with and without a severe mental disorder (SMD) and identified factors associated with successful quitting. The main hypothesis was that smokers with an SMD would be less likely to stay continuously smoke-free for 6 months.

designA prospective cohort study.

settingIn all, 302 smoking cessation clinics in Denmark from municipal clinics, pharmacies, hospitals, midwives, primary care facilities and other private providers who reported data to the national Danish Smoking Cessation Database from 2006 to 2016 participated in this study.

participantsA total of 38 293 patients from the Danish Smoking Cessation Database. Patients with an SMD were identified by linking data to the Danish National Patient Register. Diagnoses of organic mental disorders (F0 chapter) or intellectual disabilities (F7 chapter) were not included. Smokers ≥18 years old who were attending a Gold Standard Programme (GSP) with planned follow-up were included. Smokers not wanting contact after 6 months were excluded.

interventionsA comprehensive manual-based smoking cessation intervention comprising five meetings over a 6-week period (the GSP).

main outcome measuresSelf-reported continuous abstinence at the 6-month follow-up.

resultsIn all, 69% of the participants participated in the follow-up after 6 months. The overall rate of successful quitting was high but significantly lower in SMD smokers (29% vs 38%; OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.80). Variables associated with successful quitting were compliance (defined as attending ≥75% of the planned meetings), older age and male gender as well as not being disadvantaged, heavy smoking or recommendation of intervention by health professionals.

conclusionsOnly 29% of smokers with an SMD successfully quit smoking which was significantly lower than the 38% of smokers without an SMD. Compliance was the most important predictor for successful quitting.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge DistributionDatabases, FactualDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceProgram EvaluationProspective StudiesSelf ReportSex Distributioncessation interventiondual diagnosesgold standard programmemental illnesssmoking

Identifiers

PMID29895653
PMCPMC6009564
OpenAlexW2808601925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.