ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2018
Characteristics and Treatments of Patients Enrolled in the CHAMP-HF Registry Compared With Patients Enrolled in the PARADIGM-HF Trial.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors associated with non-use and sub-target dosing of medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Heart failure reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Sacubitril/valsartan in real-life European patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2021Pooled it
- Aspirin and Hemocompatibility After LVAD Implantation in Patients With Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: A Secondary Analysis From the ARIES-HM3 Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA cardiology · 2025Trial
- Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy After Hospitalization for Acute Heart Failure: Insights From the CONNECT-HF.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Trial
- Dapagliflozin and Diuretic Use in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction in DAPA-HF.Circulation · 2020 · on this mapTrial
- Initiation, titration, and safety of vericiguat for treatment of heart failure in United States clinical practice.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Prevalence and characterization of heart failure in Aragon, Spain (ICAR study).Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Novel device therapies in heart failure: focus on patient selection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- The PONTE (PDTA FOR INTEGRATED FOLLOW-UP TERRITORY HOSPITAL OF THE PATIENT WITH CARDIAC HEART FAILURE) (BRIDGE) Heart Failure project: increased adherence to guideline-recommended therapies through web-based shared clinical database.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Article
- N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide testing patterns in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- PRospective Evaluation of natriuretic peptide-based reFERral of patients with chronic heart failure in primary care (PREFER): a real-world study.Open heart · 2021Article
- Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction After a Recent Worsening Heart Failure Event.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Heart failure signs and symptoms, hospital referrals, and prescription patterns in patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan in primary care and cardiologist settings in Germany.ESC heart failure · 2020Article
- With great power comes great… reliability.European journal of heart failure · 2020Article
- Titration of Medical Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2019Observational
- Lower Hospitalization and Healthcare Costs With Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker in a Retrospective Analysis of Patients With Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
- Characteristics and Treatments of Patients Enrolled in the CHAMP-HF Registry Compared With Patients Enrolled in the PARADIGM-HF Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Article
- Telemedicine in Heart Failure during COVID-19: Like it, Love It or Lose It?Heart & lung : the journal of critical careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe US Food and Drug Administration approved sacubitril/valsartan for patients with chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction in 2015 on the basis of the results of the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI [Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor] With ACEI [Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor] to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) trial. There are limited data assessing the generalizability of PARADIGM-HF trial participants to a broader population of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction routinely encountered in outpatient clinical practice. METHODS AND
resultsWe compared the baseline characteristics of patients in the PARADIGM-HF trial with those in the CHAMP-HF (Change the Management of Patients With Heart Failure) study a large US outpatient registry of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Patients in the PARADIGM-HF trial (n=8442) were similar to those in the CHAMP-HF registry (n=3497) in terms of age (mean, 64 versus 66 years), sex (22% versus 29% women), New York Heart Association class III to IV (25% versus 32%), systolic blood pressure (mean, 121 versus 121 mm Hg), left ventricular ejection fraction (mean, 29% versus 29%), and other key baseline characteristics. The median (25th-75
conclusionsThese data suggest participants randomized in the PARADIGM-HF trial have similar baseline characteristics to those encountered in routine outpatient clinical practice, but there is a substantial lag in the adoption of sacubitril/valsartan for patients with chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.