Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29895309›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2018

Very high intact-protein formula successfully provides protein intake according to nutritional recommendations in overweight critically ill patients: a double-blind randomized trial.

Arthur R H van Zanten, Laurent Petit, Jan De Waele, Hans Kieft, Janneke de Wilde, Peter van Horssen, Marianne Klebach, Zandrie Hofman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05647135 (ImpACt of Very High Protein Content Enteral nUtrition Formulas on Protein Metabolism and Residual Gastric Volume in Critically Ill MUltipLe trAuma paTiEnts), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05647135 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

ImpACt of Very High Protein Content Enteral nUtrition Formulas on Protein Metabolism and Residual Gastric Volume in Critically Ill MUltipLe trAuma paTiEnts

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorRomanian Society for Enteral and Parenteral NutritionRan2023 to 2024Enrolled70ConditionsMetabolism, Trauma, Nutritional Deficiency, Protein MalnutritionArmsMedical food
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Arthur R H van ZantenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands. zantena@zgv.nl.
Laurent PetitSurgical and Trauma Intensive Care Unit, Pellegrin University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Jan De WaeleDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Hans KieftDepartment of Intensive Care, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Janneke de WildeNutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter van HorssenNutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marianne KlebachNutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Zandrie HofmanNutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nutricia Research (Netherlands) · NLGhent University Hospital · BEHôpital Pellegrin · FRIsala · NLZiekenhuis Gelderse Vallei · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal energy and protein provision through enteral nutrition is essential for critically ill patients. However, in clinical practice, the intake achieved is often far below the recommended targets. Because no polymeric formula with sufficient protein content is available, adequate protein intake can be achieved only by supplemental amino acids or semi-elemental formula administration. In the present study, we investigated whether protein intake can be increased with a new, very high intact-protein formula (VHPF) for enteral feeding.

methodsIn this randomized, controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial, 44 overweight (body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m

resultsThe primary outcome, protein intake at day 5, was 1.49 g/kg body weight (95% CI 1.21-1.78) and 0.76 g/kg body weight (95% CI 0.49-1.03, P < 0.001) for VHPF and SHPF, respectively. Daily protein intake was statistically significantly higher in the VHPF group compared with the SHPF group from day 2 to day 10. Protein intake in the VHPF group as a percentage of target (1.5 g/kg ideal body weight) was 74.7% (IQR 53.2-87.6%) and 111.6% (IQR 51.7-130.7%) during days 1-3 and days 4-10, respectively. Serum amino acid concentrations were higher at day 5 in the VHPF group than in the SHPF group (P = 0.031). No differences were found in energy intake, measures of gastrointestinal tolerance, and safety.

conclusionsEnteral feeding with VHPF (8 g/100 kcal) resulted in higher protein intake and plasma amino acid concentrations than an isocaloric SHPF (5 g/100 kcal), without an increase in energy intake. This VHPF facilitates feeding according to nutritional guidelines and is suitable as a first-line nutritional treatment for critically ill overweight patients.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register, NTR5643 . Registered on 2 February 2016.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexCritical IllnessDouble-Blind MethodEnteral NutritionFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOverweightProteinsIMPACT protein, humanIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProteinsEnteral nutritionHigh proteinICUIntact proteinNutritional guidelines

Identifiers

PMID29895309
PMCPMC5998555
OpenAlexW2808281119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.