Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2018
Very high intact-protein formula successfully provides protein intake according to nutritional recommendations in overweight critically ill patients: a double-blind randomized trial.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05647135 (ImpACt of Very High Protein Content Enteral nUtrition Formulas on Protein Metabolism and Residual Gastric Volume in Critically Ill MUltipLe trAuma paTiEnts), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ImpACt of Very High Protein Content Enteral nUtrition Formulas on Protein Metabolism and Residual Gastric Volume in Critically Ill MUltipLe trAuma paTiEnts
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of higher versus lower protein intake in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of higher versus lower protein provision with meaningful dose separation in critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- High-protein supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis and umbrella review of existing evidence.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- The effects of higher versus lower protein delivery in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Impact of Energy and Protein Delivery to Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- Nitrogen balance and outcomes in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- The effect of higher versus lower protein delivery in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of enteral nutrition protocols on nutritional indicators and prognosis in neurological ICU patients: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Impact of high-protein enteral nutrition on muscle preservation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Trial
- Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in brain-injured critically ill patients: a randomized trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Trial
- Gastrointestinal tolerance and compliance during a 2-week intervention of reformulated tube feeds with a plant-dominant protein blend in community-based adult patients on long-term nutritional support.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Article
- Protein nutritional support in critically ill patients: pathophysiological basis, clinical evidence, and areas of uncertainty - a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Effect of standard- versus high-protein enteral feeding on rectus femoris muscle mass in mechanically ventilated traumatic brain injury: prospective randomized study.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
- The efficacy of high-protein nutritional support on mortality, clinical outcomes, and nutritional adequacy in critically ill patients: a double‑center randomized controlled trial.Nutrition & metabolism · 2025Article
- Protein intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: A dose-response and pairwise meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Health promotion perspectives · 2025Review
- The Japanese Critical Care Nutrition Guideline 2024.Journal of intensive care · 2025Review
- Impact of an enteral nutrition protocol in critically ill patients with burn injuries.International journal of burns and trauma · 2024Article
- Enteral Feeding in Patients With Open Abdomen and Negative Pressure Therapy: A Propensity Score Analysis.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2024Article
- Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Patients 2023 (J-ReCIP 2023).Journal of intensive care · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOptimal energy and protein provision through enteral nutrition is essential for critically ill patients. However, in clinical practice, the intake achieved is often far below the recommended targets. Because no polymeric formula with sufficient protein content is available, adequate protein intake can be achieved only by supplemental amino acids or semi-elemental formula administration. In the present study, we investigated whether protein intake can be increased with a new, very high intact-protein formula (VHPF) for enteral feeding.
methodsIn this randomized, controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial, 44 overweight (body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m
resultsThe primary outcome, protein intake at day 5, was 1.49 g/kg body weight (95% CI 1.21-1.78) and 0.76 g/kg body weight (95% CI 0.49-1.03, P < 0.001) for VHPF and SHPF, respectively. Daily protein intake was statistically significantly higher in the VHPF group compared with the SHPF group from day 2 to day 10. Protein intake in the VHPF group as a percentage of target (1.5 g/kg ideal body weight) was 74.7% (IQR 53.2-87.6%) and 111.6% (IQR 51.7-130.7%) during days 1-3 and days 4-10, respectively. Serum amino acid concentrations were higher at day 5 in the VHPF group than in the SHPF group (P = 0.031). No differences were found in energy intake, measures of gastrointestinal tolerance, and safety.
conclusionsEnteral feeding with VHPF (8 g/100 kcal) resulted in higher protein intake and plasma amino acid concentrations than an isocaloric SHPF (5 g/100 kcal), without an increase in energy intake. This VHPF facilitates feeding according to nutritional guidelines and is suitable as a first-line nutritional treatment for critically ill overweight patients.
trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register, NTR5643 . Registered on 2 February 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.