Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29895280›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical research methodology2018

Effectiveness of motivational interviewing, health education and brief advice in a population of smokers who are not ready to quit.

Majid Bani-Yaghoub, Abdellatif Elhomani, Delwyn Catley

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical research methodology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01188018 (Can Motivational Interviewing be Effective for Smoking Cessation?), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01188018 phase3completednot on this map

Can Motivational Interviewing be Effective for Smoking Cessation?

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Missouri, Kansas CityRan2010 to 2012Enrolled255ConditionsSmoking, Tobacco Use, Nicotine DependenceArmsBrief Advice (BA), Motivational Interviewing (MI), Health Education (HE)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Majid Bani-YaghoubDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 5100 Rockhill Road, Kansas City, MO, 64110-2499, USA. baniyaghoubm@umkc.edu.
Abdellatif ElhomaniSchool of Medicine, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE, 68178, USA.
Delwyn CatleyDepartment of Pediatrics, Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA.
Center for Children · USCreighton University · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

Can Motivational Interviewing be Effective for Smoking Cessation?R01CA133068 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI CATLEY, DELWYN · 2009 to 2012
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA133068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMotivational Interviewing (MI), Brief Advice (BA) and Health Education (HE) are established smoking cessation induction methods for smokers with low desire to quit. Although randomized controlled trials (RCT's) have been frequently used to assess these interventions the temporal efficacy and effectiveness of these interventions have been poorly elaborated. The present work endeavors to fill the gap by considering the full range of possible motivational outcomes for all of the participants.

methodsAs a two-step process, Markov Chain (MC) and Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) models were successively employed to examine the temporal efficacy and effectiveness of these interventions by computing the gradual movements of participants from an initial stage of unmotivated smoker to stages of increased motivation to quit and cessation. Specifically, in our re-analysis of data from the RCT we examined the proportion of participants in 4 stages of readiness to quit (unmotivated, undecided, motivated, former smokers) over 6 months, across treatment groups [MI (n = 87), BA (n = 43) and HE (n = 91)].

resultsAlthough HE had greater efficacy compared to MI and BA (i.e., the highest smoking cessation rates), it had lower effectiveness at certain time points. This was due to the fact that HE had the greatest proportion of motivated smokers who quit smoking but simultaneously a large proportion of the motivated smokers became unmotivated to quit. The effectiveness of HE dropped substantially in weeks 3-12 and remained below the effectiveness of BA from week 12 onward. The 2-year ODE model projections show that the prevalence of motivated smokers in HE group may fall below 5%. The prevalence of HE former smokers can reach an equilibrium of 26%, where the prevalence of both BA and MI former smokers exceeds this equilibrium.

conclusionsThe methodology proposed in this paper strongly benefits from the capabilities of both MC and ODE modeling approaches, in the event of low observations over the time. Particularly, the temporal population sizes are first estimated by the MC model. Then they are used to parametrize the ODE model and predict future values. The methodology enabes us to determine and compare the temporal efficacy and effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions, yielding predictive and analytic insights related to temporal characteristics and capabilities of these interventions during the study period and beyond.

trial registrationTesting Counseling Styles to Motivate Smokers to Quit, NCT01188018 , (July 4, 2012). This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01188018.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth EducationHumansMaleModels, StatisticalMotivationMotivational InterviewingSmokersSmokingSmoking CessationTreatment OutcomeBrief adviceEffectivenessEfficacyHealth educationMarkov chain modelMotivational interviewingSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID29895280
PMCPMC5998452
OpenAlexW2808694422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.