Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29894623›Full record

ArticleNano letters2018

Structure and Composition Define Immunorecognition of Nucleic Acid Nanoparticles.

Enping Hong, Justin R Halman, Ankit B Shah, Emil F Khisamutdinov, Marina A Dobrovolskaia, Kirill A Afonin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Enping HongNanotechnology Characterization Lab, Cancer Research Technology Program , Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute , Frederick , Maryland 21702 , United States.
Justin R Halman
Ankit B ShahNanotechnology Characterization Lab, Cancer Research Technology Program , Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute , Frederick , Maryland 21702 , United States.
Emil F Khisamutdinov
Marina A DobrovolskaiaNanotechnology Characterization Lab, Cancer Research Technology Program , Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute , Frederick , Maryland 21702 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4233-9227
Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · USBall State University · US

Funding

Characterization of various multifunctional nucleic acid nanoparticles and understanding their immunotoxicityR01GM120487 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI AFONIN, KIRILL A · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CIntramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleic acid nanoparticles (NANPs) have evolved as a new class of therapeutics with the potential to detect and treat diseases. Despite tremendous advancements in NANP development, their immunotoxicity, one of the major impediments in clinical translation of traditional therapeutic nucleic acids (TNAs), has never been fully characterized. Here, we describe the first systematically studied immunological recognition of 25 representative RNA and DNA NANPs selected to have different design principles and physicochemical properties. We discover that, unlike traditional TNAs, NANPs used without a delivery carrier are immunoquiescent. We show that interferons (IFNs) are the key cytokines triggered by NANPs after their internalization by phagocytic cells, which agrees with predictions based on the experiences with TNAs. However, in addition to type I IFNs, type III IFNs also serve as reliable biomarkers of NANPs, which is usually not characteristic of TNAs. We show that overall immunostimulation relies on NANP shapes, connectivities, and compositions. We demonstrate that, like with traditional TNAs, plasmacytoid dendritic cells serve as the primary interferon producers among all peripheral blood mononuclear cells treated with NANPs, and scavenger receptor-mediated uptake and endosomal Toll-like receptor signaling are essential for NANP immunorecognition. The TLR involvement, however, is different from that expected for traditional TNA recognition. Based on these results, we suggest that NANP technology may serve as a prototype of auxiliary molecular language for communication with the immune system and the modulation of immune responses.

Indexed as

Dendritic CellsDNAHumansImmunity, InnateInterferonsNanoparticlesNucleic AcidsRNADNAInterferonsNucleic AcidsRNAhuman PBMCimmunorecognitioninterferonspDCRNA and DNA nanoparticlesTLR

Identifiers

PMID29894623
PMCPMC6540121
OpenAlexW2808114257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.