Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29894386›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2018

Preferences for linkage to HIV care services following a reactive self-test: discrete choice experiments in Malawi and Zambia.

Marc d'Elbée, Pitchaya P Indravudh, Lawrence Mwenge, Moses M Kumwenda, Musonda Simwinga, Augustine T Choko, Bernadette Hensen, Melissa Neuman, Jason J Ong, Euphemia L Sibanda and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Heterogeneous Patient Preferences for Modern Antiretroviral Therapy: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Marc d'ElbéeDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Pitchaya P IndravudhMalawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Lawrence MwengeZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Moses M KumwendaMalawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Musonda SimwingaZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Augustine T ChokoMalawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Bernadette HensenDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health.
Melissa NeumanDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health.
Jason J OngInternational Diagnostics Centre, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Euphemia L SibandaCentre for Sexual Health HIV and AIDS Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Cheryl C JohnsonDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Karin HatzoldPopulation Services International, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Frances M CowanCentre for Sexual Health HIV and AIDS Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Helen AylesZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Elizabeth L CorbettMalawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Fern Terris-PrestholtDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1Wellcome Trust 200901Wellcome Trust 200901/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust WT200901/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe current research identifies key drivers of demand for linkage into care following a reactive HIV self-test result in Malawi and Zambia. Preferences are explored among the general population and key groups such as HIV-positive individuals and adolescents.

designWe used discrete choice experiments (DCEs) embedded in representative household surveys to quantify the relative strength of preferences for various HIV services characteristics.

methodsThe DCE was designed on the basis of a literature review and qualitative studies. Data were collected within a survey (Malawi n = 553, Zambia n = 388), pooled across country and analysed using mixed logit models. Preference heterogeneity was explored by country, age, sex, wealth, HIV status and belief that HIV treatment is effective.

resultsDCE results were largely consistent across countries. Major barriers for linkage were fee-based testing and long wait for testing. Community-based confirmatory testing, that is at the participant's or counsellor's home, was preferred to facility-based confirmation. Providing separated waiting areas for HIV services at health facilities and mobile clinics was positively viewed in Malawi but not in Zambia. Active support for linkage was less important to respondents than other attributes. Preference heterogeneity was identified: overall, adolescents were more willing to seek care than adults, whereas HIV-positive participants were more likely to link at health facilities with separate HIV services.

conclusionPopulations in Malawi and in Zambia were responsive to low-cost, HIV care services with short waiting time provided either at the community or privately at health facilities. Hard-to-reach groups could be encouraged to link to care with targeted support.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAgedFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalawiMaleMiddle AgedSelf-ExaminationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultZambia

Identifiers

PMID29894386
PMCPMC7610994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.