Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29893936›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2019

Multi-Behavioral Endpoint Testing of an 87-Chemical Compound Library in Freshwater Planarians.

Siqi Zhang, Danielle Hagstrom, Patrick Hayes, Aaron Graham, Eva-Maria S Collins

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Backward scrunching: planarians escape from noxious stimuli, cannibalism, and predation.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. High-Throughput Toxicity Screening withEnvironmental science & technology · 2026
    Review
  5. Rapid behavioral screening in the planarianFrontiers in toxicology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Statistical analysis of multi-endpoint phenotypic screening increases sensitivity of planarian neurotoxicity testing.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Head removal enhances planarian electrotaxis.The Journal of experimental biology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Sensory-Motor Perturbations in Larval Zebrafish (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Siqi ZhangDepartment of Bioengineering.
Danielle HagstromDivision of Cell and Developmental Biology.
Patrick HayesDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering.
Aaron GrahamDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering.
Eva-Maria S CollinsDivision of Cell and Developmental Biology.
Swarthmore College · US

Funding

GENETIC MECHANISMS AND REGULATIONT32GM007240 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HAMPTON, RANDOLPH Y. · 1985 to 2019
$23.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increased recognition in the field of toxicology of the value of medium-to-high-throughput screening methods using in vitro and alternative animal models. We have previously introduced the asexual freshwater planarian Dugesia japonica as a new alternative animal model and proposed that it is particularly well-suited for the study of developmental neurotoxicology. In this article, we discuss how we have expanded and automated our screening methodology to allow for fast screening of multiple behavioral endpoints, developmental toxicity, and mortality. Using an 87-compound library provided by the National Toxicology Program, consisting of known and suspected neurotoxicants, including drugs, flame retardants, industrial chemicals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pesticides, and presumptive negative controls, we further evaluate the benefits and limitations of the system for medium-throughput screening, focusing on the technical aspects of the system. We show that, in the context of this library, planarians are the most sensitive to pesticides with 16/16 compounds causing toxicity and the least sensitive to PAHs, with only 5/17 causing toxicity. Furthermore, while none of the presumptive negative controls were bioactive in adult planarians, 2/5, acetaminophen and acetylsalicylic acid, were bioactive in regenerating worms. Notably, these compounds were previously reported as developmentally toxic in mammalian studies. Through parallel screening of adults and developing animals, planarians are thus a useful model to detect such developmental-specific effects, which was observed for 13 chemicals in this library. We use the data and experience gained from this screen to propose guidelines for best practices when using planarians for toxicology screens.

Indexed as

Animal Testing AlternativesEndpoint DeterminationPlanariansAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugModels, BiologicalSensitivity and SpecificitySmall Molecule LibrariesToxicity TestsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID29893936
PMCPMC6657585
OpenAlexW2805141634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.