Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29893798›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Fidaxomicin for Prophylaxis of Clostridium difficile-associated Diarrhea in Adults Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Kathleen M Mullane, Drew J Winston, Ajay Nooka, Michele I Morris, Patrick Stiff, Michael J Dugan, Henry Holland, Kevin Gregg, Javier A Adachi, Steven A Pergam and 5 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01691248 (DEFLECT-1), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01691248 phase3completednot on this map

DEFLECT-1: A Phase 3b Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study to Demonstrate the Safety and Efficacy of Fidaxomicin for Prophylaxis Against Clostridium Difficile-Associated Diarrhea in Adults Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

TypeinterventionalSponsorOptimer Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)Ran2012 to 2015Enrolled611ConditionsClostridium Difficile-Associated Diarrhea (CDAD)Armsfidaxomicin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Management ofEClinicalMedicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Comparative effectiveness of different therapies forThe Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025
    Article
  6. A Review of Therapies forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Strategies to preventInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Fidaxomicin for the Treatment ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Perils, Pitfalls, and Promise of Primary Prophylaxis for Clostridioides difficile Infection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen M MullaneDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois.
Drew J WinstonUCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Ajay NookaEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Michele I MorrisUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Florida.
Patrick StiffLoyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.
Michael J DuganIndiana Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Indianapolis.
Henry HollandBlood and Marrow Transplant Group, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kevin GreggDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Javier A AdachiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Steven A PergamDivision of Vaccine and Infectious Disease, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle.
Barbara D AlexanderDuke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Erik R DubberkeWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Natalya BroydeMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey.
Sherwood L GorbachTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pamela S SearsMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USDuke University · USEmory University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USIndiana Cancer Consortium · USLoyola University Chicago · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USTufts University · USUCLA Medical Center · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) is common during hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We evaluated fidaxomicin for prevention of CDAD in HSCT patients. Methods: In this double-blind study, subjects undergoing HSCT with fluoroquinolone prophylaxis stratified by transplant type (autologous/allogeneic) were randomized to once-daily oral fidaxomicin (200 mg) or a matching placebo. Dosing began within 2 days of starting conditioning or fluoroquinolone prophylaxis and continued until 7 days after neutrophil engraftment or completion of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis/clinically-indicated antimicrobials for up to 40 days. The primary endpoint was CDAD incidence through 30 days after study medication. The primary endpoint analysis counted confirmed CDAD, receipt of CDAD-effective medications (for any indication), and missing CDAD assessment (for any reason, including death) as failures; this composite analysis is referred to as "prophylaxis failure" to distinguish from the pre-specified sensitivity analysis, which counted only confirmed CDAD (by toxin immunoassay or nucleic acid amplification test) as failure. Results: Of 611 subjects enrolled, 600 were treated and analyzed. Prophylaxis failure was similar in fidaxomicin and placebo recipients (28.6% vs 30.8%; difference 2.2% [-5.1, 9.5], P = .278). However, most failures were due to non-CDAD events. Confirmed CDAD was lower in fidaxomicin vs placebo recipients (4.3% vs 10.7%; difference 6.4% [2.2, 10.6], P = .0014). Drug-related adverse events occurred in 15.0% of fidaxomicin recipients and 20.0% of placebo recipients. Conclusions: While no difference was demonstrated between arms in the primary analysis, results of the sensitivity analysis demonstrated that fidaxomicin significantly reduced the incidence of CDAD in HSCT recipients. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01691248.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsDouble-Blind MethodEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFemaleFidaxomicinHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsFidaxomicin

Identifiers

PMID29893798
PMCPMC6321849
OpenAlexW2806619463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.