Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29893792›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2019

Regulatory variants: from detection to predicting impact.

Elena Rojano, Pedro Seoane, Juan A G Ranea, James R Perkins

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic Variants of Adrenoceptors.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Resources and tools for rare disease variant interpretation.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elena RojanoDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of Malaga (UMA), 29010 Malaga, Spain.
Pedro SeoaneDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of Malaga (UMA), 29010 Malaga, Spain.
Juan A G RaneaCIBER de Enfermedades Raras, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain and Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of Malaga (UMA), 29010 Malaga, Spain.
James R PerkinsResearch laboratory, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga, UMA, Malaga 29009, Spain.
Universidad de Málaga · ESHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variants within non-coding genomic regions can greatly affect disease. In recent years, increasing focus has been given to these variants, and how they can alter regulatory elements, such as enhancers, transcription factor binding sites and DNA methylation regions. Such variants can be considered regulatory variants. Concurrently, much effort has been put into establishing international consortia to undertake large projects aimed at discovering regulatory elements in different tissues, cell lines and organisms, and probing the effects of genetic variants on regulation by measuring gene expression. Here, we describe methods and techniques for discovering disease-associated non-coding variants using sequencing technologies. We then explain the computational procedures that can be used for annotating these variants using the information from the aforementioned projects, and prediction of their putative effects, including potential pathogenicity, based on rule-based and machine learning approaches. We provide the details of techniques to validate these predictions, by mapping chromatin-chromatin and chromatin-protein interactions, and introduce Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-Associated Protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) technology, which has already been used in this field and is likely to have a big impact on its future evolution. We also give examples of regulatory variants associated with multiple complex diseases. This review is aimed at bioinformaticians interested in the characterization of regulatory variants, molecular biologists and geneticists interested in understanding more about the nature and potential role of such variants from a functional point of views, and clinicians who may wish to learn about variants in non-coding genomic regions associated with a given disease and find out what to do next to uncover how they impact on the underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidChromatinGenome, HumanHumansMachine LearningProtein BindingChromatincomplex diseasesGWASnon-coding DNAregulatory variantsvariant analysis

Identifiers

PMID29893792
PMCPMC6917219
OpenAlexW2806965771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.