ArticleJournal of neural engineering2018
Frequency-dependent antidromic activation in thalamocortical relay neurons: effects of synaptic inputs.
Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurostimulation in the treatment of psychiatric disorders: Underlying mechanisms and critical analysis of circuit-based interventions.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Review
- Mechanism and progress of deep brain stimulation in the treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders.MedScience · 2026Review
- Low-frequency antidromic pelvic neuromodulation as a potential enhancer of recovery after spinal cord injury: hypothetical promotion of spinal Renshaw cells and corticovagal plasticity.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2026Article
- The Therapeutic Frequency Profile of Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Rats Is Shaped by Antidromic Spike Failure.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Evolving characterization of the human hyperdirect pathway.Brain structure & function · 2023Review
- The cortical evoked potential corresponds with deep brain stimulation efficacy in rats.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Intracortical microstimulation pulse waveform and frequency recruits distinct spatiotemporal patterns of cortical neuron and neuropil activation.Journal of neural engineering · 2022Article
- In vivo microstimulation with cathodic and anodic asymmetric waveforms modulates spatiotemporal calcium dynamics in cortical neuropil and pyramidal neurons of male mice.Journal of neuroscience research · 2020Article
- Kilohertz waveforms optimized to produce closed-state Na+ channel inactivation eliminate onset response in nerve conduction block.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Article
- Distinct perceptive pathways selected with tonic and bursting patterns of thalamic stimulation.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDeep brain stimulation (DBS) generates action potentials (APs) in presynaptic axons and fibers of passage. The APs may be antidromically propagated to invade the cell body and/or orthodromically transmitted to downstream structures, thereby affecting widespread targets distant from the electrode. Activation of presynaptic terminals also causes trans-synaptic effects, which in turn alter the excitability of the post-synaptic neurons. Our aim was to determine how synaptic inputs affect the antidromic invasion of the cell body. APPROACH: We used a biophysically-based multi-compartment model to simulate antidromic APs in thalamocortical relay (TC) neurons. We applied distributed synaptic inputs to the model and quantified how excitatory and inhibitory inputs contributed to the fidelity of antidromic activation over a range of antidromic frequencies. MAIN
resultsAntidromic activation exhibited strong frequency dependence, which arose from the hyperpolarizing afterpotentials in the cell body and its respective recovery cycle. Low-frequency axonal spikes faithfully invaded the soma, whereas frequent failures of antidromic activation occurred at high frequencies. The frequency-dependent pattern of the antidromic activation masked burst-driver inputs to TC neurons from the cerebellum in a frequency-dependent manner. Antidromic activation also depended on the excitability of the cell body. Excitatory synaptic inputs improved the fidelity of antidromic activation by increasing the excitability, and inhibitory inputs suppressed antidromic activation by reducing soma excitability. Stimulus-induced depolarization of neuronal segments also facilitated antidromic propagation and activation. SIGNIFICANCE: The results reveal that synaptic inputs, stimulus frequency, and electrode position regulate antidromic activation of the cell body during extracellular stimulation. These findings provide a biophysical basis for interpreting the widespread inhibition/activation of target nuclei during DBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.