Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29893243›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. HIV2018

A continuum of HIV care describing mortality and loss to follow-up: a longitudinal cohort study.

Sophie Jose, Valerie Delpech, Alison Howarth, Fiona Burns, Teresa Hill, Kholoud Porter, Caroline A Sabin, UK CHIC Study Steering Committee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. HIV, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. HIV Care Seeking Pathways and Barriers to the Continuum of Care Faced by Persons Living With HIV in Rural Nepal: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sophie JoseCentre for Clinical Research, Epidemiology, Modelling and Evaluation, Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London, London, UK.
Valerie DelpechPublic Health England, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London, London, UK.
Alison HowarthCentre for Clinical Research in Infection and Sexual Health, Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Fiona BurnsCentre for Clinical Research in Infection and Sexual Health, Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK; Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Teresa HillCentre for Clinical Research, Epidemiology, Modelling and Evaluation, Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Kholoud PorterCentre for Clinical Research, Epidemiology, Modelling and Evaluation, Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London, London, UK.
Caroline A SabinCentre for Clinical Research, Epidemiology, Modelling and Evaluation, Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: c.sabin@ucl.ac.uk.
UK CHIC Study Steering Committee

Funding

Medical Research Council G0000199Medical Research Council G0600337Medical Research Council G0900274Medical Research Council M004236Medical Research Council MC_U122886351Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/15Medical Research Council MR/M004236/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cross-sectional HIV care continuum is widely used to assess the success of HIV care programmes among populations of people with HIV and the potential for ongoing transmission. We aimed to investigate whether a longitudinal continuum, which incorporates loss to follow-up and mortality, might provide further insights about the performance of care programmes.

methodsIn this longitudinal cohort study, we included individuals who entered the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (CHIC) study between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2004, and were linked to the national HIV cohort database (HIV and AIDS Reporting System). For each month during a 10 year follow up period, we classified individuals into one of ten distinct categories according to engagement in care, antiretroviral therapy (ART) use, viral suppression, loss to cohort follow-up and loss to care, and mortality, and assessed the proportion of person-months of follow-up spent in each stage of the continuum. 5 year longitudinal continuums were also constructed for three separate cohorts (baseline years of entry 2000-03, 2004-07, and 2008-09) to compare changes over time.

findingsWe included 12 811 people contributing 1 537 320 person-months in our analysis. During 10 years of follow-up, individuals spent 811 057 (52·8%) of 1 537 320 person-months on ART. Of the 811 057 person-months spent on ART, individuals had a viral load of 200 copies per mL or less for 607 185 (74·9%) person-months. 10 years after cohort entry, 3612 (28·1%) of 12 811 individuals were lost to follow-up, 954 (26·4%) of whom had transferred to a non-CHIC UK clinic for care. By 10 years, 759 (5·9%) of 12 811 participants who entered the cohort had died. Loss to follow-up decreased and the proportion of person-months that individuals spent virally suppressed increased over calendar time.

interpretationLoss to follow-up in HIV care programmes was high and rates of viral suppression were lower than previously reported. Complementary information provided by a longitudinal continuum might highlight areas for intervention along the HIV care pathway, however, transfers outside the cohort must be accounted for.

fundingMedical Research Council, UK.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLongitudinal StudiesLost to Follow-UpMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationReview Literature as TopicSustained Virologic ResponseTime FactorsAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID29893243
PMCPMC5990495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.