Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29893025›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2018

The wound-healing effects of a next-generation anti-biofilm silver Hydrofiber wound dressing on deep partial-thickness wounds using a porcine model.

Stephen C Davis, Jie Li, Joel Gil, Jose Valdes, Michael Solis, Alex Higa, Philip Bowler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Silver Sulfadiazine Eradicates Antibiotic-TolerantJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen C DavisDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Jie LiDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Joel GilDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Jose ValdesDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Michael SolisDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Alex HigaDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Philip BowlerConvaTec Limited, Flintshire, UK.
University of Miami · USConvaTec (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

ConvaTec Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topical antimicrobials are widely used to control wound bioburden and facilitate wound healing; however, the fine balance between antimicrobial efficacy and non-toxicity must be achieved. This study evaluated whether an anti-biofilm silver-containing wound dressing interfered with the normal healing process in non-contaminated deep partial thickness wounds. In an in-vivo porcine wound model using 2 pigs, 96 wounds were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 dressing groups: anti-biofilm silver Hydrofiber dressing (test), silver Hydrofiber dressing (control), or polyurethane film dressing (control). Wounds were investigated for 8 days, and wound biopsies (n = 4) were taken from each dressing group, per animal, on days 2, 4, 6, and 8 after wounding and evaluated using light microscopy. No statistically significant differences were observed in the rate of reepithelialisation, white blood cell infiltration, angiogenesis, or granulation tissue formation following application of the anti-biofilm silver Hydrofiber dressing versus the 2 control dressings. Overall, epithelial thickness was similar between groups. Some differences in infiltration of specific cell types were observed between groups. There were no signs of tissue necrosis, fibrosis, or fatty infiltration in any group. An anti-biofilm silver Hydrofiber wound dressing did not cause any notable interference with normal healing processes.

Indexed as

Bandages, HydrocolloidAnimalsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBiofilmsHumansSilverSwineWound HealingWound InfectionWounds and InjuriesAnti-Infective Agents, LocalSilveranti-biofilm dressingshealingpartial thickness woundsporcine modelsilver

Identifiers

PMID29893025
PMCPMC7949536
OpenAlexW2808180110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.