Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29892698›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors reports2018

Dual diagnosis competencies: A systematic review of staff training literature.

Melissa Petrakis, Rebecca Robinson, Kevan Myers, Simon Kroes, Sarah O'Connor

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melissa PetrakisMental Health Service, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Rebecca RobinsonFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Kevan MyersNexus, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Simon KroesNexus, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Sarah O'ConnorNeami National, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo conduct a systematic review of the literature regarding approaches to staff training in dual diagnosis competencies.

methodsA search was conducted using eight databases: Informit, Taylor & Francis, Springer, Proquest, Expand, Sage, Psych info, Elsevier and Cinahl. The year range was 2005 to April 2015. An additional manual search of reference lists was conducted to ensure relevant articles were not overlooked.

resultsOf 129 potential results, there were only 11 articles regarding staff training in dual diagnosis. The limited studies included problems: small sample sizes, selection biases, and questions as to validity of some capability instruments, and low inclusion of service user perspectives. Organisational challenges to greater uptake of staff training including agency size, agency willingness to change, and a need to change policies.

conclusionsThere is a pressing need for more research, and quality research, in this important area of knowledge translation, dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices. In particular there is limited literature regarding the efficacy of dual diagnosis competency resources, and a gap as to use of the mentoring in dual diagnosis capacity building.

Indexed as

Dual diagnosisMental healthReasons for use scaleSubstance useSystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID29892698
PMCPMC5993964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.