Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29892691›Full record

ReviewGynecologic oncology reports2018

Evidence-based improvisation: Facing the challenges of cervical cancer care in Uganda.

Megan Swanson, Stefanie Ueda, Lee-May Chen, Megan J Huchko, Carol Nakisige, Jane Namugga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ovarian cancer presentation and management in sub-Saharan Africa: a scooping review protocal.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Downregulation ofTranslational cancer research · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Initiatives to reduce the waiting time to initiate oncological treatment: a scoping literature review.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megan SwansonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, United States.
Stefanie UedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, United States.
Lee-May ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, United States.
Megan J HuchkoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke Global Health Institute, United States.
Carol NakisigeDivision of Gynaecologic Oncology, Uganda Cancer Institute, Makerere University College for Health Sciences School of Medicine, United States.
Jane NamuggaDivision of Gynaecologic Oncology, Mulago National Referral Hospital, Makerere University College for Health Sciences School of Medicine, Uganda.

Funding

University of California Launching Future Leaders in Global Health Research Training ProgramD43TW009343 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CRAIG R COHEN, Sung-Jae Lee · 2017 to 2026
$14.7M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is significant disparity in the prevalence of cervical cancer globally, with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) shouldering a disproportionate share of disease incidence and an even greater proportion of morbidity and mortality. Available resources for diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cervical cancer are inversely related to per capita income. While prevention and screening remain public health priorities, given the large number of women affected by cervical cancer, expanding treatment capacity should be included in any evidence-based intervention plan. Uganda, a country with a high incidence of cervical cancer, serves as a representative case study in terms of the challenges of diagnosis and access to treatment in sub-Saharan Africa. Providers and patients in Uganda are challenged by late presentation to care, limited training opportunities, cost-prohibitive diagnostic studies, insufficient access to gold-standard treatment, and under-utilized palliative care services. This review highlights the ways in which Uganda's experience is typical of the continent at large, as well as areas where Uganda is unique. We describe the ways in which a small but dedicated group of gynecologists carefully use limited evidence and available resources creatively to provide the best possible care for their patients. We show that improvisation, albeit evidence-based, is central to the nature and success of oncology care in Africa (Livingston, 2012). We argue that a "recalibrated global response" (Farmer et al., 2010), particularly stressing the expansion of radiotherapy capabilities, could dramatically improve cancer care and outcomes for women in Uganda as well as in LMICs globally.

Identifiers

PMID29892691
PMCPMC5993527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.