ArticleData in brief2018
Article in Data in brief, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- PromoterAtlas: decoding regulatory sequences across Gammaproteobacteria using a transformer model.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Bacillus subtilis: current and future modification strategies as a protein secreting factory.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Review
- iPro2L-DG: Hybrid network based on improved densenet and global attention mechanism for identifying promoter sequences.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Computational methods for identifying enhancer-promoter interactions.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2023Review
- Prediction and validation of novel SigB regulon members in Bacillus subtilis and regulon structure comparison to Bacillales members.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters identification based on residual network transfer learning.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2022Article
- Critical assessment of computational tools for prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoter prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a prediction of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.