The robustness and generalizability of findings on spontaneous false belief sensitivity: a replication attempt.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

1. No one-to-one mapping between typologies of pragmatic relations and models of pragmatic processing: a case study with mentalizing.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
   Review
2. Altercentric Memory Error at 9 Months But Correct Object Memory by 18 Months Revealed in Infants' Pupil.Developmental science · 2025
   Article
3. Verbal Perceptual Prompts Facilitate Children's Sensitivity to False Beliefs.Journal of Intelligence · 2024
   Article
4. Evaluative contexts facilitate implicit mentalizing: relation to the broader autism phenotype and mental health.Scientific reports · 2024
   Article
5. Spontaneous theory of mind in autism: are anticipatory gaze and reaction time biases consistent?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024
   Article
6. Evidence against implicit belief processing in a blindfold task.PloS one · 2023
   Article
7. Can 18-Month-Olds Revise Attributed Beliefs?Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2023
   Article
8. How robust are egocentric and altercentric interference effects in social cognition? a test with explicit and implicit versions of a continuous false belief task.Frontiers in psychology · 2023
   Article
9. The Effect of Social Presence on Mentalizing Behavior.Cognitive science · 2022
   Article
10. A two-lab direct replication attempt of Southgate, Senju and Csibra (2007).Royal Society open science · 2021
    Article
11. Infants' performance in the indirect false belief tasks: A second-person interpretation.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2021
    Review
12. Implicit Theory of Mind under realistic social circumstances measured with mobile eye-tracking.Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
13. Implicit Theory of Mind under realistic social circumstances measured with mobile eye-tracking.Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
14. Are the classic false belief tasks cursed? Young children are just as likely as older children to pass a false belief task when they are not required to overcome the curse of knowledge.PloS one · 2021
    Article
15. Actions do not speak louder than words in an interactive false belief task.Royal Society open science · 2020
    Article
16. Testing the stability of theory of mind: A longitudinal approach.PloS one · 2020
    Article
17. Is implicit Theory of Mind real but hard to detect? Testing adults with different stimulus materials.Royal Society open science · 2019
    Article
18. Empirical Failures of the Claim That Autistic People Lack a Theory of Mind.Archives of scientific psychology · 2019
    Article
19. Why can some implicit Theory of Mind tasks be replicated and others cannot? A test of mentalizing versus submentalizing accounts.PloS one · 2019
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as