ArticleMethods in ecology and evolution2018
An efficient extension of N-mixture models for multi-species abundance estimation.
Article in Methods in ecology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Space-for-time substitutions exaggerate urban bird-habitat ecological relationships.The Journal of animal ecology · 2024Article
- N-mixture models for population estimation: Application in spotted lanternfly egg mass survey.Current research in insect science · 2024Review
- Assessing trends in population size of three unmarked species: A comparison of a multi-species N-mixture model and random encounter models.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Simulation-based assessment of the performance of hierarchical abundance estimators for camera trap surveys of unmarked species.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Zero-inflated count distributions for capture-mark-reencounter data.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Sharing detection heterogeneity information among species in community models of occupancy and abundance can strengthen inference.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Identifying mismatches between conservation area networks and vulnerable populations using spatial randomization.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Within-season movements of Alpine songbird distributions are driven by fine-scale environmental characteristics.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Coalescence modeling of intrainfectionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study we propose an extension of the N-mixture family of models that targets an improvement of the statistical properties of rare species abundance estimators when sample sizes are low, yet typical for tropical studies. The proposed method harnesses information from other species in an ecological community to correct each species' estimator. We provide guidance to determine the sample size required to estimate accurately the abundance of rare tropical species when attempting to estimate the abundance of single species.We evaluate the proposed methods using an assumption of 50 m radius plots and perform simulations comprising a broad range of sample sizes, true abundances and detectability values and a complex data generating process. The extension of the N-mixture model is achieved by assuming that the detection probabilities are drawn at random from a beta distribution in a multi-species fashion. This hierarchical model avoids having to specify a single detection probability parameter per species in the targeted community. Parameter estimation is done via Maximum Likelihood.We compared our multi-species approach with previously proposed multi-species N-mixture models, which we show are biased when the true densities of species in the community are less than seven individuals per 100 hectares. The beta N-mixture model proposed here outperforms the traditional Multi-species N-mixture model by allowing the estimation of organisms at lower densities and controlling the bias in the estimation.We illustrate how our methodology can be used to suggest sample sizes required to estimate the abundance of organisms, when these are either rare, common or abundant. When the interest is full communities, we show how the multi-species approaches, and in particular our beta model and estimation methodology, can be used as a practical solution to estimate organism densities from rapid inventory datasets. The statistical inferences done with our model via Maximum Likelihood can also be used to group species in a community according to their detectabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.