Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29892147›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of medical sciences2018

In Vivo Comparative Evaluation of the Pomegranate (Punica granatum) Peel Extract as an Alternative Agent to Nystatin against Oral Candidiasis.

Shahindokht Bassiri-Jahromi, Mohammad Reza Pourshafie, Esmat Mirabzade Ardakani, Amir Hooshang Ehsani, Aida Doostkam, Farzad Katirae, Ehsan Mostafavi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmaceutics · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Anti-helminthic effect ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Pomegranate: A review of the heavenly healer's past, present, and future.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Oncology reviews · 2018
    Article
  13. Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shahindokht Bassiri-JahromiDepartment of Medical Mycology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Reza PourshafieDepartment of Microbiology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Esmat Mirabzade ArdakaniBiotechnology Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Molecular Medicine Group, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Hooshang EhsaniDepartment of Dermatology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Aida DoostkamDepartment of Pharmacology, Medical school, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
Farzad KatiraeDepartment of Pathobiology, Section of Mycology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Ehsan MostafaviDepartment of Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Pasteur Institute of Iran · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pomegranate peel extract is a rich source of natural antioxidant and antimicrobial activity. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the in vivo antifungal activity of the pomegranate peel extract and to compare it with nystatin against oral candidiasis in Wistar rats.

methodsThirty-five male Wistar rats, 6 to 8 weeks old and 220 to 250 g in weight, were used for animal studies. The rats were randomly divided into 7 groups. All the rats, except the control group, were immunosuppressed with cyclosporine (40 mg/kg/d) and hydrocortisone acetate (500 µg/kg/d). Then oral candidiasis was induced via the oral administration of a suspension of

resultsRegardless of the concentration of the pomegranate peel extract used for the treatment of oral candidiasis, a significant improvement was seen after 15 days of treatment. All the doses of the pomegranate peel were effective against candidiasis after 15 days; the pomegranate peel extract had no adverse effects following administration in the rats.

conclusionOur results indicated that the pomegranate peel extract is a promising approach to oral candidiasis treatment, and it may serve as a natural alternative prospect due to its potency against oral candidiasis.

Indexed as

Animal experimentationAntifungal agentsCandidiasisMouthPomegranate

Identifiers

PMID29892147
PMCPMC5993896
OpenAlexW2758881121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.