ArticleNature communications2018
Publisher Correction: Precisely printable and biocompatible silk fibroin bioink for digital light processing 3D printing.
Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Silk Fibroin Methacrylation: Chemical Synthesis to Biomechanical Optimization in Tissue Engineering.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
- A 3D-Bioprinted Functional Module Based on Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioink for Periodontal Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- The Technique of Thyroid Cartilage Scaffold Support Formation for Extrusion-Based Bioprinting.International journal of bioprinting · 2021Article
- Recent Advances in Formulating and Processing Biomaterial Inks for Vat Polymerization-Based 3D Printing.Advanced healthcare materials · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The original version of this Article contained errors in Figs. 5 and 6. In Fig. 5b, the second panel on the bottom row was stretched out of proportion. In Fig. 6d, the first panel was also stretched out of proportion. In Fig. 6f, the fifth panel inadvertently repeated the fourth. This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.